![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Stefan" wrote in message
... Depending on the wind situation, you can expect downdrafts of 10 fpm or even more. No light single will outclimb this, even less at altitude. You need to recalibrate your vertical speed reference. 10 fpm (or 20 fpm, as you wrote elsewhere) is 10 feet per minute. That's nothing, and quite a bit less than any actual up or down that one might find due to mountain wave or similar effects. I have no idea what you meant to write, but it's absolutely false that "no light single will outclimb" 10 fpm downdraft. Pete |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Duniho wrote:
"Stefan" wrote in message ... Depending on the wind situation, you can expect downdrafts of 10 fpm or even more. No light single will outclimb this, even less at altitude. You need to recalibrate your vertical speed reference. 10 fpm (or 20 fpm, as you wrote elsewhere) is 10 feet per minute. That's nothing, and quite a bit less than any actual up or down that one might find due to mountain wave or similar effects. I have no idea what you meant to write, but it's absolutely false that "no light single will outclimb" 10 fpm downdraft. Pete |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Duniho wrote:
10 feet per minute. .... I have no idea what you meant to write, I've meant 1000 to 2000 fpm. Stefan |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Stefan wrote: Peter Duniho wrote: 10 feet per minute. ... I have no idea what you meant to write, I've meant 1000 to 2000 fpm. Still isn't fatal. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps wrote:
I've meant 1000 to 2000 fpm. Still isn't fatal. Nobody talked about fatal. You just can't outclimb this at altitude with a light, non turbo charged single. So it may indeed become fatal, and has so on a regular basis, for those who don't know how to behave in the mountains. Stefan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
TSA rule 49 CFR Part 1552 (or its misinterpretation) is already preventing people from flying (even renters) (long) | Bay Aviator | Piloting | 15 | October 21st 04 10:29 PM |
the thrill of flying interview is here! | Dudley Henriques | Piloting | 0 | October 21st 03 07:41 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |