A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Mountain flying knowledge required?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 26th 05, 04:08 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Newps wrote:
tony roberts wrote:



You don't fly down the middle, because that may not leave you

enough
space to do a 180 either way


Right.


You don't fly on the updraft side - even though that initially

seems the
safest - because if things change and you need to do a 180, you now

have
to turn into the downdraft - which you may not be able to recover

from.

Wrong. You fly on the downwind side, also known as the updraft side.


If you lose your engine and you are in a downdraft just how smart is
that? You don't knowingly fly in downdrafts, unless of course you

want
to go down.



So you fly in the downdraft side. If you can handle that you will

get
through. If things get worse, at least your 180 will be into a nice

safe
updraft.


If things get worse you may be plastered on the mountain before you

can
turn around.


I guess I would prefer to fly the updraft side of a canyon, unless it
is a narrow canyon (a narrow canyon is one where the radius of turn
exceeds half the canyon width). Take advantage of the lift.

The radius of turn varies as the square of the true airspeed. Even at
80 knots TAS and limiting yourself to a 35-degree bank, you only
require 811.7 feet for the radius of turn.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
NTSB: USAF included? Larry Dighera Piloting 10 September 11th 05 10:33 AM
TSA rule 49 CFR Part 1552 (or its misinterpretation) is already preventing people from flying (even renters) (long) Bay Aviator Piloting 15 October 21st 04 10:29 PM
the thrill of flying interview is here! Dudley Henriques Piloting 0 October 21st 03 07:41 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Š2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.