![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scott Moore" wrote in message ... I was talking about driving the glideslope needle. Pretty much by definition, WAAS is going to have to drive the needle to be a precision device. On my 430, the glideslope needle is driven (obviously) by the box, and when Garmin talks OK, you can do it today (legally actually) by using any IFR approach-approved GPS of your choice plus a handheld Garmin 295 or Garmin 196. Both of these handheld Garmin units are WAAS-enabled and have an electronic HSI page with a synthetic glideslope needle linked to a VNAV function. You can legally use an IFR approach GPS and then you can supplement this with the VNAV data from the handheld GPS ** as long as you do no go below any published altitudes on the approach **. -- Richard Kaplan, CFII www.flyimc.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Richard Kaplan wrote: "Scott Moore" wrote in message ... I was talking about driving the glideslope needle. Pretty much by definition, WAAS is going to have to drive the needle to be a precision device. On my 430, the glideslope needle is driven (obviously) by the box, and when Garmin talks OK, you can do it today (legally actually) by using any IFR approach-approved GPS of your choice plus a handheld Garmin 295 or Garmin 196. Both of these handheld Garmin units are WAAS-enabled and have an electronic HSI page with a synthetic glideslope needle linked to a VNAV function. You can legally use an IFR approach GPS and then you can supplement this with the VNAV data from the handheld GPS ** as long as you do no go below any published altitudes on the approach **. Check the RNAV Runway 24 at KCRQ, then pass that one by us again. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|