![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
john smith wrote:
Dudley, don't misunderstand me. Hoover (an a limited number of others) are special circumstances. Everything I have read stated that the Shrike was a stock airplane. I don't recall that Hoover ever spins in the airplane. The video of the roll while pouring a glass of water is sure a hoot, though! As I said in my post, in the right hands, some maneuvers not approve by the manufacturer can in fact be performed safely. I believe that Bob also said at one airshow that he never stressed the Shrike beyond its certification load limits. As someone said earlier, it often isn't the aerobatic maneuver itself that stresses the airframe, it is the botched maneuver or the recovery from a botched maneuver where the extra strength is needed. Obviously, Mr. Hoover doesn't have to worry about that. :-) Matt |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... john smith wrote: Dudley, don't misunderstand me. Hoover (an a limited number of others) are special circumstances. Everything I have read stated that the Shrike was a stock airplane. I don't recall that Hoover ever spins in the airplane. The video of the roll while pouring a glass of water is sure a hoot, though! As I said in my post, in the right hands, some maneuvers not approve by the manufacturer can in fact be performed safely. I believe that Bob also said at one airshow that he never stressed the Shrike beyond its certification load limits. As someone said earlier, it often isn't the aerobatic maneuver itself that stresses the airframe, it is the botched maneuver or the recovery from a botched maneuver where the extra strength is needed. Obviously, Mr. Hoover doesn't have to worry about that. :-) According to Liefeld, Hoover's Shrike had just two modifications other than its smoke system. An hydraulic accumulator in the baggage compartment held hydraulic pressure so Hoover could extend the gear when the airplane was upside down and the engines feathered. It also provided Hoover with nosewheel steering following his deadstick landing and rollout. The second mod was an automatic unfeathering system. Hoover would shut down the engines by pulling the prop controls to Feather position while leaving the throttles and mixture controls in place. To restart, he would advance the prop levers, tripping microswitches on electric pumps that unfeathered the props so they would windmill and restart. Matt --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
What's Wrong with Economics and how can it be Fixed | What's Wrong with Economics and how can it be Fixe | Naval Aviation | 5 | August 21st 04 12:50 AM |
What's Wrong with Economics and how can it be Fixed | What's Wrong with Economics and how can it be Fixe | Military Aviation | 3 | August 21st 04 12:40 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |