![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think the idea is that the pilot, with sufficient information in a
sufficiently good display and interface, would be able to handle separation (under IMC) as well as he could under VMC. If this is true (and I'm not convinced that it is yet), then much of the need for the IFR system would be eliminated. I am aware that under high traffic conditions this breaks down (which is presumably why we have alphabet airspace to begin with) Jose -- Get high on gasoline: fly an airplane. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jose wrote: I think the idea is that the pilot, with sufficient information in a sufficiently good display and interface, would be able to handle separation (under IMC) as well as he could under VMC. If this is true (and I'm not convinced that it is yet), then much of the need for the IFR system would be eliminated. I am aware that under high traffic conditions this breaks down (which is presumably why we have alphabet airspace to begin with) It's not just high traffic conditions. An airplane can seperate itself from nearby airplanes but it doesn't have the ability to take into account the whole system. A disabled aircraft on the runway at say LAX riplles thru out the whole NAS. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's not just high traffic conditions. An airplane can seperate itself from nearby airplanes but it doesn't have the ability to take into account the whole system. A disabled aircraft on the runway at say LAX riplles thru out the whole NAS.
Why? (serious question) I suspect the answer involves a sea of airplanes each of which needs the other to do something (such as clear the airspace) before -it- can do something (such as enter it), and this has to do with IFR separation requirements, which is (one reason) why bad weather can tie airspace in knots, where as in good weather traffic is more resiliant. If all air traffic were VFR, would a disabled aircraft at LAX impact the whole NAS? Jose -- Get high on gasoline: fly an airplane. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jose wrote: It's not just high traffic conditions. An airplane can seperate itself from nearby airplanes but it doesn't have the ability to take into account the whole system. A disabled aircraft on the runway at say LAX riplles thru out the whole NAS. Why? (serious question) A 1/2 hour runway shutdown at a major hub means an instantaneous ground stop for that airport. Too many airplanes all in the same space. If all air traffic were VFR, would a disabled aircraft at LAX impact the whole NAS? Separation requirements don't really affect much. You can have 8 stacks of 10 airplanes at 40, 50, 60, 70,..... miles from the airport. Basically unlimited. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
User Fees | Dude | Owning | 36 | March 19th 05 05:57 PM |
NAA Fees to the US Team | Doug Jacobs | Soaring | 2 | October 29th 04 01:09 AM |
LXE installation XP, strict user permissions. | Hannes | Soaring | 0 | March 21st 04 11:15 PM |
The Irony of Boeing/Jeppesen Being Charged User Fees! | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 9 | January 23rd 04 12:23 PM |
Angel Flight pilots: Ever have an FBO refuse to wave landing fees? | Peter R. | Piloting | 11 | August 2nd 03 01:20 AM |