![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roy Smith" wrote in message ... You can keep adding redundency to get the probability of incapacitation as low as you want, but eventually an event will happen which will take Even assuming ATC has the manpower and frequency bandwidth to simultaneously give vectors to all airplanes in an area of GPS outage, do we land nowhere but runways with ASR approaches when it is IMC in that region until the GPS service is resolved? And if we want to take off with a void clearance, do we just consider airports without radar coverage down to the surface to be unusable during IMC since there would be no navigation system available on takeoff? Or maybe we just go by dead reckoning on takeoff? What happens if there is a need for an emergency medical aircraft in a region where GPS is out of service and no radar coverage is available? Central Pensylvania east of Johnstown is just one excellent example --- there is a pretty significantly sized area where there is no radar coverage available for apporches, so I suppose if sole-nav GPS went out of service in the region all the airports would just become VFR-only. Clearly this situation is absurd, and for that reason we cannot and never will switch to GPS-only navigation. Maybe there will be fewer but strategically placed VORs and ILS systems but clearly there always must and will remain some backup system besides just GPS. -- Richard Kaplan, CFII www.flyimc.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard Kaplan" wrote:
Clearly this situation is absurd, and for that reason we cannot and never will switch to GPS-only navigation. Is anybody saying that we should? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|