![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com, Michael wrote:
Let me tell you, a 1969 Arrow sucks rocks in comparison. Wrong comparison. In new aircraft, the right comparison for an Arrow would be the Diamond DA-40 rather than the Cirrus (or Lancair). I have flown the DA-40, and I do greatly prefer it to the Arrow (even a new one) - it's easier to get in and out of, has a back door, stick instead of yoke, looks much better, faster on 20 less horsepower and doesn't have the maintenance involved with retractable gear or CS prop. -- Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net "Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 04 May 2005 16:20:24 -0000, Dylan Smith
wrote: In new aircraft, the right comparison for an Arrow would be the Diamond DA-40 rather than the Cirrus (or Lancair). I have flown the DA-40, and I do greatly prefer it to the Arrow (even a new one) - it's easier to get in and out of, has a back door, stick instead of yoke, looks much better, faster on 20 less horsepower and doesn't have the maintenance involved with retractable gear or CS prop. And it is available with the Thielert-diesel-engine. My club currently has a demonstrator on the line. Really great airplane, 135 KTAS on 6 gph and almost incredibly easy to fly. Purchase is a little bit on the expensive side, though. I would love to try out a Cirrus one day to see if the Star and the SR20 are by any means comparable. Tobias |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tobias,
Purchase is a little bit on the expensive side, though. Ain't that the truth... I would love to try out a Cirrus one day to see if the Star and the SR20 are by any means comparable. Don't. It would spoil your DA-40 enthusiasm. The Cirrus is MUCH more of an airplane. Much more solid feel, much nicer interior, "real" doors et cetera, whereas the DA-40 somehow still hints at its roots as a motorglider. The only two things the DA-40 is better in is visibility and engine technology (diesel available). And the SR20, with the current US$ conversion rate, is even cheaper in Europe than the DA-40. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 05 May 2005 09:17:14 +0200, Thomas Borchert
wrote: I would love to try out a Cirrus one day to see if the Star and the SR20 are by any means comparable. Don't. It would spoil your DA-40 enthusiasm. I just saw on the Cirrus website that they are offering FREE demo rides for CFIs (hope this offer is also valid with their European sales organisation...). http://www.cirrusdesign.com/seeacirrus/demoflight/ Has anyone ever tried this out? Tobias |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tobias,
Has anyone ever tried this out? Uh, the original poster in this thread? It's not that hard to get a free demo ride, e.g. in Germany. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dylan Smith wrote:
In new aircraft, the right comparison for an Arrow would be the Diamond DA-40 rather than the Cirrus (or Lancair). I have flown the DA-40, and I do greatly prefer it to the Arrow (even a new one) - it's easier to get in and out of, has a back door, stick instead of yoke, looks much better, faster on 20 less horsepower and doesn't have the maintenance involved with retractable gear or CS prop. I think you forgot the most important point: It's fun to fly. Stefan |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Stefan wrote:
I think you forgot the most important point: It's fun to fly. Indeed it is - more due to the awesome visibility you get than the handling (it's definitely designed to be easy in IFR and not 'sporty'!) -- Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net "Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee" |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In new aircraft, the right comparison for an Arrow would be the
Diamond DA-40 rather than the Cirrus (or Lancair). There is NO comparison for the Arrow in new aircraft because the Arrow came into being solely to satisfy regulatory requirements - specifically the requirement to take the commercial and CFI in a complex airplane. The DA-40 is not an adequate substitute. The reasonable comparison for the DA-40 is the Cheetah or Tiger. Michael |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
Fractional Ownership - Cirrus SR22 | Rich Raine | Owning | 3 | December 24th 03 05:36 AM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |
Real World Specs for FS 2004 | Paul H. | Simulators | 16 | August 18th 03 09:25 AM |