![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok, brother flyers, cards on the table here. I always do a run-up
before taking the active (my Mooney only sees pavement, so gravel damage isn't a serious consideration) as do I think most of you. I'm a M20J jock. I have, in some 3000 hours, returned to base after taxing out only about 4 times. Once, in a normally inducted Mooney Ranger the carb heat wire broke during that test (quite a surprise when you pull out a foot of wire!), a couple of time because a radio wasn't working, once because a bank of spark plugs weren't firing. Never had to come back because the prop didn't cycle correctly. I am NOT saying don't cycle the prop! I am wondering what failure modes you guys have experienced during run up. I've had in flight mag bank failures, vacuum pump failures, alternator, radio, and common sense failures too. All but the last lead to a landing at the nearest suitable airport (ever notice how often a failure is in solid IFR?). The common sense failure modes did not result in landing at the nearest airport or turning around, but they should have. OK, I've shown you mine. Let's see yours. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tony" wrote in message oups.com... Ok, brother flyers, cards on the table here. I always do a run-up before taking the active (my Mooney only sees pavement, so gravel damage isn't a serious consideration) as do I think most of you. I'm a M20J jock. I have, in some 3000 hours, returned to base after taxing out only about 4 times. Once, in a normally inducted Mooney Ranger the carb heat wire broke during that test (quite a surprise when you pull out a foot of wire!), a couple of time because a radio wasn't working, once because a bank of spark plugs weren't firing. Never had to come back because the prop didn't cycle correctly. I am NOT saying don't cycle the prop! I am wondering what failure modes you guys have experienced during run up. I've had in flight mag bank failures, vacuum pump failures, alternator, radio, and common sense failures too. All but the last lead to a landing at the nearest suitable airport (ever notice how often a failure is in solid IFR?). The common sense failure modes did not result in landing at the nearest airport or turning around, but they should have. OK, I've shown you mine. Let's see yours. The reason for cycling the prop is to pump the cold oil out and move in the warmed oil. If the oil stayed warm from the previous flight then there is no valid reason to cycle it again. The MAG check is valid before every takeoff following a restart. Any number of things could have happened during the last flight that would be revealed with this simple check.... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Blueskies wrote:
The MAG check is valid before every takeoff following a restart. Any number of things could have happened during the last flight that would be revealed with this simple check.... Like taxiing to the runway without properly leaning beforehand. I always do a run-up and prop cycle as part of every pre-takeoff checklist. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Blueskies" wrote in message
m... The reason for cycling the prop is to pump the cold oil out and move in the warmed oil. That's the reason for cycling the prop several times (I usually do it three during a "cold" run-up). Cycling it at least once is for verifying proper operation, and is a valid reason no matter how many times you've done it before (by the same logic you use to argue for doing a magneto check every time). Pete |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... "Blueskies" wrote in message m... The reason for cycling the prop is to pump the cold oil out and move in the warmed oil. That's the reason for cycling the prop several times (I usually do it three during a "cold" run-up). Cycling it at least once is for verifying proper operation, and is a valid reason no matter how many times you've done it before (by the same logic you use to argue for doing a magneto check every time). Pete Initial application of power and watching the RPM stabilize is enough to ensure proper propeller governor operation... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Blueskies" wrote in message
news ![]() Initial application of power and watching the RPM stabilize is enough to ensure proper propeller governor operation... That's like saying jiggling the yoke is enough to ensure that the controls are "free and correct". |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Changes in Instrument Proficiency Check Requirements | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 71 | June 10th 04 08:02 PM |
Pitch and Diameter of 3 blade prop for IO-360 200HP | Bart D. Hull | Home Built | 1 | December 11th 03 11:42 PM |
Use of hand-held GPS on FAA check ride | Barry | Rotorcraft | 1 | August 30th 03 01:24 AM |
Use of hand-held GPS on FAA check ride | Barry | Piloting | 3 | August 9th 03 10:14 PM |
Use of hand-held GPS on FAA check ride | Barry | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | August 9th 03 09:25 PM |