![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Galban" wrote in message oups.com... Dylan Smith wrote: snip In any case, it's a problem that cannot be ignored. It's not just that burning fossil fuels is adding CO2 to the atmosphere, it's: * fossil fuels are not infinite, and indeed although there may be enough to outlast everyone alive today, the *cheap* oil is rather more limited. Our current lifestyles don't just depend on oil, they depend on oil that is very cheap. * we are having to depend on hostile nations for energy supply * the damage will not be reversable, at least not in our lifetimes. I agree wholeheartedly with your first two points. The economic and political ramifications of relying on cheap oil are not good for anyone. Of course, the way most economies work, alternatives will not be exploited until the oil becomes more expensive than the alternative. What you describe is a "market economy", which is rather UNCOMMON. More common is a COMMAND economy. I can easily see a day when oil at $500/bbl will result in everyone flying high-tech solar powered airplanes (*note aviation content!*) and heating their homes with solar supplied hydrogen. When oil is no longer economically feasable, something cheaper will take its place. Probably longgggg before oil becomes $500/bbl. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|