Finish lines

In article ,
Fred Mueller wrote:

Bruce Hoult wrote:
In article ,
Fred Mueller wrote:


Now lets say you've arrived over the
end of the field opposite the direction of landing and you're at 400
feet and 55 knots. You have been sweating the glide for miles and to
land straight ahead into traffic you are now in a high energy situation
to get down and stopped without rolling too far into the oncoming
traffic.


Going downwind at 400 ft at the departure end of the field?

That's 200 ft higher and a 180 degree turn better off than the rope
breaks that we routinely expect pre-solo pilots to cope with!

From an energy standpoint there is no problem at least not a low energy
problem, there is now a high energy problem. Imagine yourself at 400
feet on the downwind threshold. Where are you going to land on that
runway? Now imagine a half dozen or more gliders coming at you landing
from the opposite direction and some of those gliders intend to land
long.

Why on earth would you land downwind from such a position?

Angle off to the pattern side of the runway a little, fly downwind until
you get to 200 ft (more than 2 km unless there is sink) or the end of
the runway, do a 180 and land with the other traffic.

--
Bruce | 41.1670S | \ spoken | -+-
Hoult | 174.8263E | /\ here. | ----------O----------

I rest my case.

Bruce Hoult wrote:
snip

Why on earth would you land downwind from such a position?

Angle off to the pattern side of the runway a little, fly downwind until
you get to 200 ft (more than 2 km unless there is sink) or the end of
the runway, do a 180 and land with the other traffic.