A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

I Will Never Understand Wind



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 7th 05, 04:35 PM
Dylan Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Matt Barrow wrote:
In article au2fe.55730$NU4.36038@attbi_s22, Jay Honeck wrote:
trouble with hydrogen is it's
difficult to store, difficult to handle, costs lots of energy to make
(either with oil directly or by electrolyis).


Today it is, but it's like oil was 100 years ago.

Not wanting to be harsh, but stop thinking statically, in the short
term...try thinking like an inventor/entrepreneur, not a schoolboy/employee.
Most of all, stop barfing back with the schools/media feeds you.


Actually, it's the schools/media feeding everyone this hydrogen pipe
dream. It's precisely because I'm thinking like an inventor/entrepreneur
that I suspect it will be much more practical, cheaper, faster and
better to develop diesel based technologies when it comes to the storage
and use of fuels (particularly in large machines).

--
Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man
Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net
Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net
"Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee"
  #2  
Old May 7th 05, 04:48 PM
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dylan Smith" wrote in message
...
In article , Matt Barrow wrote:
In article au2fe.55730$NU4.36038@attbi_s22, Jay Honeck wrote:
trouble with hydrogen is it's
difficult to store, difficult to handle, costs lots of energy to make
(either with oil directly or by electrolyis).


Today it is, but it's like oil was 100 years ago.

Not wanting to be harsh, but stop thinking statically, in the short
term...try thinking like an inventor/entrepreneur, not a

schoolboy/employee.
Most of all, stop barfing back with the schools/media feeds you.


Actually, it's the schools/media feeding everyone this hydrogen pipe
dream.


Absolute BS!

It's precisely because I'm thinking like an inventor/entrepreneur
that I suspect it will be much more practical, cheaper, faster and
better to develop diesel based technologies when it comes to the storage
and use of fuels (particularly in large machines).


You call going with a slight adjustment to the status quo
inventor/entrepreneurship?



  #3  
Old May 7th 05, 06:21 PM
Dylan Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Matt Barrow wrote:
You call going with a slight adjustment to the status quo
inventor/entrepreneurship?


No, that's why I didn't mention one.

--
Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man
Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net
Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net
"Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee"
  #4  
Old May 8th 05, 02:16 AM
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dylan Smith" wrote in message
...
In article , Matt Barrow wrote:
You call going with a slight adjustment to the status quo
inventor/entrepreneurship?


No, that's why I didn't mention one.


Umm...yes, you did.

Diesels are neither necessary, even in the longer term, nor desirable due to
their ability to generate pollution if not maintained.

And inventor/entrepreneur is still bound by laws of the market unless they
live in a command economy.


  #5  
Old May 8th 05, 01:51 PM
Dylan Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Matt Barrow wrote:
And inventor/entrepreneur is still bound by laws of the market unless they
live in a command economy.


Exactly; that's why the 'hydrogen economy' won't be here any time soon,
but biodiesels will be. The back end for the use of biodiesel needs a
radical change but the front end (i.e. the end users) don't need the
radical change.

Look at pretty much any entrepeneur - I think we can all agree Bill
Gates is an exemplar with this - yet Bill Gates and Microsoft have never
done anything radical at the 'front end' because the market won't stand
for it. (In fact Microsoft can barely be counted as being an innovator)

--
Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man
Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net
Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net
"Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee"
  #6  
Old May 9th 05, 12:05 PM
Grumman-581
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dylan Smith" wrote in message
...
Look at pretty much any entrepeneur - I think we can all agree Bill
Gates is an exemplar with this - yet Bill Gates and Microsoft have never
done anything radical at the 'front end' because the market won't stand
for it. (In fact Microsoft can barely be counted as being an innovator)


The "Blue Screen of Death" does not count as innovative? Damn, you're hard
to please...


  #7  
Old May 9th 05, 12:53 PM
Dylan Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article HtHfe.65240$NU4.52784@attbi_s22, Grumman-581 wrote:
The "Blue Screen of Death" does not count as innovative? Damn, you're hard
to please...


Apparently, Longhorn will also have a *red* screen of death!

--
Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man
Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net
Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net
"Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee"
  #8  
Old May 9th 05, 03:52 PM
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Grumman-581" wrote in message
news:HtHfe.65240$NU4.52784@attbi_s22...
"Dylan Smith" wrote in message
...
Look at pretty much any entrepeneur - I think we can all agree Bill
Gates is an exemplar with this - yet Bill Gates and Microsoft have never
done anything radical at the 'front end' because the market won't stand
for it. (In fact Microsoft can barely be counted as being an innovator)


The "Blue Screen of Death" does not count as innovative? Damn, you're

hard
to please...

I understand that the vast majority of MS's R&D goes for reverse engineering
competing products.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.