![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Happy Dog" wrote in message news ![]() Ask for the clearance. You're in violation without it. ATC should know better. Yeah, you're in violation of the letter of the law and ATC should know better. But the controller you're talking to is pretty much the only person that's in a position to file a violation, and controllers tend to dislike paperwork. Pressing the issue doesn't seem worth the frequency clutter to me. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steven P. McNicoll"
Ask for the clearance. You're in violation without it. ATC should know better. Yeah, you're in violation of the letter of the law and ATC should know better. But the controller you're talking to is pretty much the only person that's in a position to file a violation, and controllers tend to dislike paperwork. Pressing the issue doesn't seem worth the frequency clutter to me. I'm not normally paranoid, but I always ask for a stated clearance even when I'm sure the controller just forgot to say the words. I've asked for SVFR before and the controller missed it even though it was obvious I wanted it. The controller asked me to re-state the request. It was a very similar situation to what we're talking about. Something like: CXXX tower this is GXXX with information X GXXX, CXXX tower, go ahead GXXX is 7 nm NE, inbound landing, requesting SVFR please. GXXX, visibility is 3 miles, SVFR is required I understand and I've requested it. please repeat the request. CXXX tower, GXXX requests SVFR. SVFR granted. Call left base for runway XX. I think clearance procedures should be held to the highest standard. moo |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What F-102 units were called up for Viet Nam | Tarver Engineering | Military Aviation | 101 | March 5th 06 03:13 AM |