![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sonny, I spent my first ten years out of college working on military toys
that didn't have a chance in hell of working. You don't think I can make the distinction? STINK is the operative part of distinction here. Jim "Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "RST Engineering" wrote in message ... Sonny, I spent my first ten years out of college working on military toys that didn't have a chance in hell of working. Such as? Expound on that if your would...and please, no annecdotes. You don't think I can make the distinction? When doing R&D, how do we know what will work and what won't? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"RST Engineering" wrote in message
... Sonny, I spent my first ten years out of college working on military toys that didn't have a chance in hell of working. Such as? Expound on that if your would...and please, no annecdotes. First of all, that is anecdotes. Is your spell checker not working these days? And it is you, and not your. Second of all, how can you relate an experience working on a project without telling the story? Anecdotal memory is all we have unless you want a transcript out of my engineering notebook. Third, what I was working on in those days was TS, and I'm not about to jeopardize my ever getting a TS clearance again by relating to you the guts of what I was doing. I have absolutely no idea if the stuff has been released into the public domain, but I highly doubt it. One of the projects was an electrically steerable antenna array meant to interfere with another signal. It was so goosey and unstable that the only way we could keep it reasonably operational was to hold ambient temperature within a couple of degrees and vibration to a tenth of a G. And this was an aircraft application. One of the projects was a powerline detector for rotary wing aircraft that would certainly detect powerlines, but about two seconds AFTER the aircraft impacted the lines at any reasonable forward velocity. There are half a dozen more, equally as ridiculous. You don't think I can make the distinction? When doing R&D, how do we know what will work and what won't? When you are asked to do something that violates a basic law of known physics. Sure, you can be Einstein and discover a whole new set of laws, but don't bet the farm on it. Jim |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|