![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Gene Kearns wrote: On Mon, 09 May 2005 02:08:34 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: Let me jump in here with a confused expression..... When they first created the alphabetic areas, I was taught that Class B airspace required a specific clearance prior to entrance..... thus, something like "N12345 cleared to enter Class B airspace" as opposed to just "establishing" two-way communications as required in Class C.... and just barging in. That is correct (clearance req'd for B). Your example would be most likely heard when VFR. If you're on an IFR clearance already, you wouldn't need the VFR "magic words". As for readbacks... As for VFR, I'd have to admit that I'm really not clear on the absolute requirements, though I tend to read back everything that shouldn't be obvious or ambiguous.... Hold short instructions must be read back. Just about everything else is optional (according to the absolute requirements). Occasionally, I'll run across a controller that wants me to read back a clearance and I'll certainly oblige, but there is no regulatory requirement for me to have read it back when he gave it to me. When I operated out of a class B primary airport, my clearance into class B was usually tacked on to a paragraph of instructions on what I was supposed to do once I was in the class B. Being a local, the whole spiel was pretty standard and I usually just wilcoed the whole thing. Given the usual lack of airtime on the class B approach freq., the controllers were probably thankful that I didn't tie up their frequency with a readback. Basically, I just use my judgement when deciding what to readback. Sometimes a complete readback is appropriate (even though not required) and other times not. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What F-102 units were called up for Viet Nam | Tarver Engineering | Military Aviation | 101 | March 5th 06 03:13 AM |