A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

It was really close...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 13th 05, 01:02 PM
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Then they came for me, and by that time no one was left to speak up.

************************************************** *****************************
Now they are willing to kill people who get lost and cross invisible
lines in the sky so that the powerful and the politically connected can
feel safe... Will they next start shooting our children because they
ride their bikes across an invisible line on the ground?


Denny, normally I'm right with you and your thoughts -- but this is an
absurd comparison.

We have restricted areas over our seat of government for very clear and
well-defined reasons, and every certificated pilot knows it. To compare
this situation to what the Nazis did is to trivialize the death of millions.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #2  
Old May 13th 05, 01:34 PM
Jay Masino
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jay Honeck wrote:
We have restricted areas over our seat of government for very clear and
well-defined reasons, snip

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
No we don't.




--
__!__
Jay and Teresa Masino ___(_)___
http://www2.ari.net/jmasino ! ! !
http://www.oceancityairport.com
http://www.oc-adolfos.com
  #3  
Old May 17th 05, 07:28 AM
John Lakesford
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I agree.

And Honeck (according to his address) flies outta Iowa City, IA and not DC.
I fly out of the middle of nowhere and can't imagine what it is like flying
around the nations capitol.

So I will give these guys the benefit of the doubt. They screwed up, and so
have I.

I can only guess that Honeck and others here never have and never will.

I only wish I, and the rest of us, were as good as you.


"Jay Masino" wrote in message
...
Jay Honeck wrote:
We have restricted areas over our seat of government for very clear and
well-defined reasons, snip

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
No we don't.




--
__!__
Jay and Teresa Masino ___(_)___
http://www2.ari.net/jmasino ! ! !
http://www.oceancityairport.com
http://www.oc-adolfos.com



  #4  
Old May 17th 05, 10:49 PM
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

John Lakesford wrote:
I agree.

And Honeck (according to his address) flies outta Iowa City, IA and not DC.
I fly out of the middle of nowhere and can't imagine what it is like flying
around the nations capitol.


Well, I've flown west of DC many times and into DC once. I flew into
National at night prior to 9/11. It was actually a piece of cake. I
was rather nervous on the way in having to get an IFR reservation, be
within a certain time window, etc., but it was actually much easier than
I expected. I got vectored out of line to let three airliners land and
circled a few times over one of the monuments, I forget which one now,
but it wasn't far from the prohibited area. It was really easy to see
the landmarks at night and it would have been very hard to fly near the
White House and not know it. The Potomac also provides a very good
landmark.

The only hard part was taxing in after landing!


So I will give these guys the benefit of the doubt. They screwed up, and so
have I.


Yes, they did and in a very serious way.

I fly from a fairly rural area (ELM and N38), but if I fly near a
metropolitan area I make sure I'm prepared. If I'm not, then I don't go
there. These guys were unprepared in several very fundamental ways and
shouldn't have been within 50 miles of DC in their stage of preparation.


Matt
  #5  
Old May 13th 05, 02:02 PM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jay,

We have restricted areas over our seat of government for very clear and
well-defined reasons,


And what would those be?

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #6  
Old May 13th 05, 06:10 PM
gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Thomas Borchert" wrote in message

We have restricted areas over our seat of government for very clear and
well-defined reasons,

And what would those be?


Well, you see, a long time ago, on September 11, 2001, some nice people
thought it might be fun to fly an airplane into the Pentagon.

I wonder if there's a correlation between tightened security around
Washington DC and the airplane that crashed into the Pentagon.

Hmmm....might need to think about that for awhile.
-c


  #7  
Old May 13th 05, 07:33 PM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"gatt" wrote in message
...
[...]
I wonder if there's a correlation between tightened security around
Washington DC and the airplane that crashed into the Pentagon.


A correlation doesn't prove reason.


  #8  
Old May 13th 05, 08:52 PM
gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Peter Duniho" wrote in message

I wonder if there's a correlation between tightened security around
Washington DC and the airplane that crashed into the Pentagon.


A correlation doesn't prove reason.


People can play logical soccer with the issue all they want, but the
airspace is closed, any legitimate pilot in America knows the airspace is
closed, it's damned difficult to get lost in the DC area and fighters were
scrambled to either deter or destroy the aircraft.

As it should be. There's no particular reason at this point to let pilots
run amok over Washington DC.

-c


  #9  
Old May 13th 05, 09:12 PM
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

the airspace is
closed, [...] As it should be. There's no particular reason at this point to let

pilots
run amok over Washington DC.


Why is this as it should be?

And what particular reason is there at this point to let pilots run amok
over Chicago? Or anywhere else?

Jose
--
Money: what you need when you run out of brains.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #10  
Old May 13th 05, 10:04 PM
gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jose" wrote in message news:fT7he.1712

the airspace is closed, [...] As it should be. There's no particular

reason at this point to let pilots run amok over Washington DC.

Why is this as it should be?


There's a war going on. Precisely why there's no particular reason to let
illegal immigrants run amok into America.

Some of them are hostile.

And what particular reason is there at this point to let pilots run amok
over Chicago? Or anywhere else?


The most powerful government in the world--and the one that Americans
consider most important--is not in Chicago.

-c


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Close call with engine failure in IMC G. Sylvester Instrument Flight Rules 12 March 16th 05 05:57 AM
Comming close Tony Owning 17 May 18th 04 06:22 AM
RAF Boulmer (England) to close Peter Ure Naval Aviation 0 April 29th 04 05:02 AM
D.A.: Pilot flew close to airliner John R Piloting 8 February 3rd 04 11:03 AM
Veteran fighter pilots try to help close training gap Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 December 2nd 03 10:09 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.