![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:k4Vge.77243$WI3.40856@attbi_s71... That report includes the statement that "ASF studies have shown that low pilot time in type is often a significant contributing factor in accidents." But I didn't see any specific data there to back it up. I think if we read "between the lines" we will find that the poster is really concerned with this pilot's youth -- perhaps more so than with his low flight time. A 17 year old boy is basically a fleshy container of hormones, with great stamina, questionable stability, and loads of bravado. This is NOT necessarily a great fit with being a new pilot -- especially when you put two of these guys inside the same vehicle. There are very good reasons that car insurance for 17 year old boys costs exponentially more than for adults. They generally have poor judgment, and are known to end their statements -- and sometimes their lives -- with "Watch this!" Personally, I'd be VERY reluctant to allow my son to fly with another 17 year old boy. -- Jay, Would you let your son drive with a 17 year old? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Piloting | 114 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |