2-stroke diesel is the (near) future?

"LCT Paintball" wrote ...
writing. It finally dawned on me that if I look down at bad speellers
then


Please tell me you did that on purpose.



Usenet Rule #5: "All posts complaining about spelling must themselves
contain at least one misspeeling".

Rich

Usenet Rule #5: "All posts complaining about spelling must themselves
contain at least one misspeeling".

Rich


Sorry, I missed that memo.
For the record, I disagree with you. I cannot spell, but I'm no idiot. Some
people are good at math, others are athletic, and others can spell. Just
because it's easy for you doesn't mean it is for others.

"LCT Paintball" wrote in message
news:M2dhe.77611$NU4.15647@attbi_s22...
Usenet Rule #5: "All posts complaining about spelling must themselves
contain at least one misspeeling".

Rich


Sorry, I missed that memo.
For the record, I disagree with you. I cannot spell, but I'm no idiot.
Some people are good at math, others are athletic, and others can spell.
Just because it's easy for you doesn't mean it is for others.

Easy is not a factor. All things worth doing require effort. What is
"cannot"?

Rich S.

Easy is not a factor. All things worth doing require effort. What is
"cannot"?

Rich S.

Very good argument.

"LCT Paintball" wrote in message
news:BIehe.79335$WI3.31550@attbi_s71...
Easy is not a factor. All things worth doing require effort. What is
"cannot"?

Rich S.

Very good argument.


Thanks. Age is a mitigating factor, though. I will no longer play poker for
real money. :-=

Rich S.

LCT Paintball wrote:
Easy is not a factor. All things worth doing require effort. What
is
"cannot"?

Rich S.

Very good argument.


Only thing is that many things don't have to be perfect.

"LCT Paintball" wrote

For the record, I disagree with you. I cannot spell, but I'm no idiot.
Some
people are good at math, others are athletic, and others can spell. Just
because it's easy for you doesn't mean it is for others.

True, but _everyone_ can take the time to re-read their post, and everyone
can learn basic rules, like their-there, to-too-two. By not doing that,
people that can't spell _do_ look like morons.

They should run spell check if'in they know they have a speeling problem,
also.
--
Jim in NC

"Morgans" skrev i meddelandet
...

True, but _everyone_ can take the time to re-read their post, and everyone
can learn basic rules, like their-there, to-too-two. By not doing that,
people that can't spell _do_ look like morons.

They should run spell check if'in they know they have a speeling problem,
also.
--
Jim in NC

So I am a moron if my spelling isnt correct? Bet I know more about your
language
(english) than you know of mine (swedish), and I will not call you any bad
names
if you are not correct when trying to use mine.

With bad or good spelling. Have a nice day Owe R

"ower" wrote

Bet I know more about your
language
(english) than you know of mine (swedish),

Well, I have to give you a break, considering you are a non English speaker.
I (and others) should have caught that fact.

Do as well as you can, and re-read your posts, and all is forgiven. g
--
Jim in NC

Morgans wrote:
"LCT Paintball" wrote

For the record, I disagree with you. I cannot spell, but I'm no
idiot.
Some
people are good at math, others are athletic, and others can spell.
Just
because it's easy for you doesn't mean it is for others.

True, but _everyone_ can take the time to re-read their post, and
everyone
can learn basic rules, like their-there, to-too-two. By not doing
that,
people that can't spell _do_ look like morons.

They should run spell check if'in they know they have a speeling
problem,
also.
--
Jim in NC


HELLO! It's just the friggin usenet! Most of us don't even know who
we are talking too. Some of us have more important things to do, such
as correspondance on a 10 million dollor project. You bet that baby
gets proofread, spell checked, grammer checked, proofread, maybe ask a
co worker to proofread it, see what I missed, etc.