![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lighten up man. I stated I did not have the sectional and you never stated
that it was under the C airspace. "Ron Rosenfeld" wrote in message ... On Fri, 13 May 2005 17:10:18 -0400, "Paul Lynch" wrote: The sectional may also show that MBO is actually in or partially in the surface to 4000AGL Class C airspace since it is so close to Jackson. If that is the case, then the viz and cloud clearance requirements would preclude that VFR traffic from LEGALLY operating. I reviewed data prior to MY posting which indicates the contrary to your assumption. With regard to your specific statement regarding the CCA, over MBO the floor of the CCA is at 1700'MSL (or 1374' AGL). Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 14 May 2005 18:15:48 -0400, "Paul Lynch" wrote:
Lighten up man. I stated I did not have the sectional and you never stated that it was under the C airspace. Sorry about that. After I typed and hit send I realized it sounded harsh. And I did not intend that. Usually I check my posts for that sort of thing, but I was in a hurry. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No problem. I may be oversensitive from some other newsgroups where the
shotguns are always out and blasting away! "Ron Rosenfeld" wrote in message ... On Sat, 14 May 2005 18:15:48 -0400, "Paul Lynch" wrote: Lighten up man. I stated I did not have the sectional and you never stated that it was under the C airspace. Sorry about that. After I typed and hit send I realized it sounded harsh. And I did not intend that. Usually I check my posts for that sort of thing, but I was in a hurry. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Y'All,
Here are some thoughts that I have not yet posted to my web site. Would appreciate any additions. Gene Whitt Flying in Circles IFR ---Circling approaches are an option to be avoided in times of reduced visibility ---Circling requires that you have the runway in sight at all times ---You cannot leave the circling MDA unless able to descend to the runway ---You must choose the circle before descending below its MDA ---Circling at night, in low visibility and exposed to disorientation is a lost poker hand ---The notes restricting just where circling is allowed is usually a clue ---Don't ask for a circling approach where ceilings are not well above circling minimums ---By keeping your distance from the airport until turning final you avoid 'killer' bank angles ---Being IFR in VFR conditions at an airport does NOT give you any special 'rights' ---Go missed if you lose visual of the runway |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gene Whitt wrote:
Y'All, Here are some thoughts that I have not yet posted to my web site. Would appreciate any additions. I'd add a note that although it is often recommended that one not descend below MDA until you are aligned on the final, there are some circling approaches where following this policy will cause you to miss, since at the minimum permissible visibility, you will be too high to descend to the runway. Gene Whitt Flying in Circles IFR ---Circling approaches are an option to be avoided in times of reduced visibility ---Circling requires that you have the runway in sight at all times ---You cannot leave the circling MDA unless able to descend to the runway ---You must choose the circle before descending below its MDA "the" - "to" ? You must choose to circle... ? ---Circling at night, in low visibility and exposed to disorientation is a lost poker hand ---The notes restricting just where circling is allowed is usually a clue ---Don't ask for a circling approach where ceilings are not well above circling minimums ---By keeping your distance from the airport until turning final you avoid 'killer' bank angles ---Being IFR in VFR conditions at an airport does NOT give you any special 'rights' ---Go missed if you lose visual of the runway |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gene,
Although I agree that circling approaches at minimums are arguably one of the most dangerous things a GA IFR pilot can do, I feel that with proper training, briefing and precautions, they can be safely accomplished. It gets into the area of trying to teach judgement. --ron On Mon, 16 May 2005 15:08:09 GMT, "Gene Whitt" wrote: Y'All, Here are some thoughts that I have not yet posted to my web site. Would appreciate any additions. Gene Whitt Flying in Circles IFR ---Circling approaches are an option to be avoided in times of reduced visibility Circling approaches are an option to be approached with extreme caution in times of reduced visibility ---Circling requires that you have the runway in sight at all times ---You cannot leave the circling MDA unless able to descend to the runway USING NORMAL MANEUVERS AND AT A NORMAL RATE OF SPEED ---You must choose the circle before descending below its MDA ---Circling at night, in low visibility and exposed to disorientation is a POTENTIALLY LOSING POKER HAND ---The notes restricting just where circling is allowed is usually a clue ---Don't ask for a circling approach where ceilings are not well above circling minimums UNLESS YOU ARE CONFIDENT OF YOUR ABILITIES; AND CURRENT WITH THE PROCEDURE. ---By keeping your distance from the airport until turning final you avoid 'killer' bank angles ---Being IFR in VFR conditions at an airport does NOT give you any special 'rights' Add emphasis to this one (above) ---Go missed if you lose visual of the runway AT ANY TIME, EVEN IF JUST BRIEFLY. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 16 May 2005 15:08:09 GMT, "Gene Whitt"
wrote: Y'All, Here are some thoughts that I have not yet posted to my web site. Would appreciate any additions. Gene Whitt Oh, and I'd add: If you don't have the runway in sight prior to the MDA, you may NOT be able to make a successful landing using normal maneuvers (a requirement to operate below the MDA). Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Rosenfeld wrote:
If you don't have the runway in sight prior to the MDA, you may NOT be able to make a successful landing using normal maneuvers (a requirement to operate below the MDA). I'm sure Gene understands what you are saying, but for my benefit, could you elaborate a little on this statement? Why is this true? Thanks. Dave |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Butler wrote in news:1116264343.869268@sj-nntpcache-5:
Ron Rosenfeld wrote: If you don't have the runway in sight prior to the MDA, you may NOT be able to make a successful landing using normal maneuvers (a requirement to operate below the MDA). I'm sure Gene understands what you are saying, but for my benefit, could you elaborate a little on this statement? Why is this true? Cloud bases are seldom perfectly level. They are lower in some places than in others. If you get the airport in sight right at MDA, then it's likely that there will be areas where the cloud bases will be below MDA, and you'll probably fly through them as you circle. -- Regards, Stan "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." B. Franklin |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 16 May 2005 13:28:42 -0400, Dave Butler wrote:
Ron Rosenfeld wrote: If you don't have the runway in sight prior to the MDA, you may NOT be able to make a successful landing using normal maneuvers (a requirement to operate below the MDA). I'm sure Gene understands what you are saying, but for my benefit, could you elaborate a little on this statement? Why is this true? Thanks. Dave I miswrote a bit. In addition to what others have written, what I really meant to write was that "if you don't have the airport in sight prior to the MAP (missed approach point) ..." And the reason for that has to do with geometry. The MAP may be too close and to allow for normal maneuvers to land. (And using normal maneuvers is a requirement of 91.175) Sorry about the confusion. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Confused about great circle navigation | xerj | Piloting | 7 | July 10th 04 05:38 PM |
R in a Circle (Airport Surveillance Radar) on VFR charts | Jeff Saylor | Piloting | 66 | May 12th 04 04:05 PM |
Great circle formulae, True cource and actual heading | Sims | Piloting | 27 | October 11th 03 01:55 PM |
Defensive circle | Dave Eadsforth | Military Aviation | 23 | October 9th 03 06:13 PM |
NACO charts - why have a reference circle? | Bob Gardner | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | September 6th 03 01:15 PM |