A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

It was really close...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 15th 05, 01:30 AM
Mike W.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
Despite the 2nd Amendment, we don't let people carry guns and grenades

on
airplanes either.


What's that got to do with Americans' right to freely move about the
country?


Are you kidding me? What they can't effectively control, they just pass
legislation against. So everybody pays a penalty by having their individual
freedoms taken away. Except, of course, those who don't care to play by the
rules.

--
Hello, my name is Mike, and I am an airplane addict....


  #2  
Old May 15th 05, 01:53 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Mike W." wrote in message
...
Are you kidding me? What they can't effectively control, they just pass
legislation against. So everybody pays a penalty by having their
individual
freedoms taken away. Except, of course, those who don't care to play by
the
rules.


You haven't explained how the 2nd Amendment along with the exception
disallowing guns and grenades on airplanes (and technically, those are only
disallowed on commercial flights) has anything to do with Americans' rights
to freely move about the country (and in particular, justifying restricting
that right).

Why would I be kidding you?

Pete


  #3  
Old May 15th 05, 02:19 AM
Mike W.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
You haven't explained how the 2nd Amendment along with the exception
disallowing guns and grenades on airplanes (and technically, those are

only
disallowed on commercial flights) has anything to do with Americans'

rights
to freely move about the country (and in particular, justifying

restricting
that right).
Pete

I guess I misread the direction of your post.

All amendments have exceptions to them, not just the second. In your
example, it is probably for the best.

I think the thing that bothers me the most about all of this TSA 'national
security' crap, it is not protecting the nation at all, just the idiots that
are running it.


  #4  
Old May 15th 05, 05:18 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Mike W." wrote in message
...
I guess I misread the direction of your post.


I think so.

[...]
I think the thing that bothers me the most about all of this TSA 'national
security' crap, it is not protecting the nation at all, just the idiots
that
are running it.


I certainly agree, if by "protect" you mean "ensure continuous employment".

Pete


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Close call with engine failure in IMC G. Sylvester Instrument Flight Rules 12 March 16th 05 05:57 AM
Comming close Tony Owning 17 May 18th 04 06:22 AM
RAF Boulmer (England) to close Peter Ure Naval Aviation 0 April 29th 04 05:02 AM
D.A.: Pilot flew close to airliner John R Piloting 8 February 3rd 04 11:03 AM
Veteran fighter pilots try to help close training gap Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 December 2nd 03 10:09 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.