|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
May 15th 05, 09:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
The Saudi 406s based on the OH-58D were new-build too.
Understand the evolution, but I suspect the MELB-derivative for ARH is also going to be pretty far from the OH-6A. The MELB is supposed to have a better aft cabin door, and we haven't seen what the Boeing/MDI ARH cabin yet. The crashworthiness comparison has always seemed to favor the OH-6A over the 58A/C. I don't believe either airframe has gotten a whole lot better since those first models. You can argue that 58Ds have just gone through safety enhancements including some seat improvements. I'm curious to see how both teams address the crashworthiness issue. HW 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
Hybrid Mode
