![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#121
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"gatt" wrote in message ...
Despite the 2nd Amendment, we don't let people carry guns and grenades on airplanes either. Yeah, the 2nd Amendment has been slowly eroded by all the ****in' leftists... They can't quite understand that "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" means EXACTLY that... There's no EXCEPT WHEN CONVENIENT" clause to it... |
#122
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"EastWing" wrote in message
t... Collateral damage. And considering the liberal cesspool that is DC, it would be ACCEPTABLE collateral damages... |
#123
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mortimer Schnerd, RN" wrote in message
om... What goes up must come down. Somewhere. The technical term for that is, "GRAVITY SUCKS"... |
#124
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"W P Dixon" wrote in message ...
Lincoln started a very bad trend of the Federal Government having all of the power,...and to this day we are at the mercy of the Federal Government. Yep, Lincoln proved that the concept of States Rights was just a fiction... All in all considered, HE is the one who started the War of Northern Aggression... |
#125
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
3. Light aircraft are a possible means of delivering a weapon of some
kind. So are every car, van, SUV and truck driving around in DC. And most of them can carry a lot more explosive payload than the overwhelming majority of GA aircraft. This argument sounds amazingly like the Army/Navy brass, back in the 1920s, when they were trying to pooh-pooh Billy Mitchell's theory that an aircraft could sink battleships, which, at the time, were thought to be impregnable from the air. Obviously, history teaches us that aircraft turned out to be the ultimate battlefield weapons, and control of the air is now considered essential to any battle. Bottom line: It's relatively easy to secure land targets from Ryder trucks, but it's very difficult to secure them from a Cherokee Six filled with anthrax and C-4. THAT is why we have an ADIZ over D.C., and anyone who argues otherwise is only fooling themselves. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#126
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bottom line: It's relatively easy to secure land targets from Ryder trucks,
but it's very difficult to secure them from a Cherokee Six filled with anthrax and C-4. THAT is why we have an ADIZ over D.C., and anyone who argues otherwise is only fooling themselves. Following that line of reasoning, there should be a no-fly zone around DC, and a huge ADIZ around every major city in the country. The price of freedom is... well... freedom. Jose -- Money: what you need when you run out of brains. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#127
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay,
THAT is why we have an ADIZ over D.C., and anyone who argues otherwise is only fooling themselves. Oh! If you say so, sir! Nope, you got it wrong. With that line of reasoning, you'd be living in a dictatorship real quick. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#128
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose,
The price of freedom is... well... freedom. I love it! -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#129
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jose wrote: Bottom line: It's relatively easy to secure land targets from Ryder trucks, but it's very difficult to secure them from a Cherokee Six filled with anthrax and C-4. THAT is why we have an ADIZ over D.C., and anyone who argues otherwise is only fooling themselves. Following that line of reasoning, there should be a no-fly zone around DC, and a huge ADIZ around every major city in the country. The price of freedom is... well... freedom. Jose -- Money: what you need when you run out of brains. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. I don't have a problem with an ADIZ. The problem I have is that airliners which can carry more explosives than a Ryder truck are allowed to fly in it, but GA planes are not. |
#130
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Bottom line: It's relatively easy to secure land targets from Ryder trucks, but it's very difficult to secure them from a Cherokee Six filled with anthrax and C-4. THAT is why we have an ADIZ over D.C., and anyone who argues otherwise is only fooling themselves. Following that line of reasoning, there should be a no-fly zone around DC, and a huge ADIZ around every major city in the country. Chicago's King Daley's assertions notwithstanding, no other city in America has the concentration of power that presents such an obvious and inviting target for (another) terrorist attack. As with so many things in a democracy, the ADIZ currently in place is an imperfect compromise between absolute freedom, and absolute prohibition. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Close call with engine failure in IMC | G. Sylvester | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | March 16th 05 05:57 AM |
Comming close | Tony | Owning | 17 | May 18th 04 06:22 AM |
RAF Boulmer (England) to close | Peter Ure | Naval Aviation | 0 | April 29th 04 05:02 AM |
D.A.: Pilot flew close to airliner | John R | Piloting | 8 | February 3rd 04 11:03 AM |
Veteran fighter pilots try to help close training gap | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | December 2nd 03 10:09 PM |