Security in the USA

"Montblack" wrote in message
...
("john smith" wrote)
I am simply amazed that we are spending hundreds of millions of dollars
to
protect people we vote out of office every four to six years because of
their incompetence.


In one of the last elections (1998) the re-election number for members of
Congress was something like 98%.

(Found it)
http://www.thisnation.com/question/016.html


It's been that way since the 1940's.

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...

"Montblack" wrote in message
...
("john smith" wrote)
I am simply amazed that we are spending hundreds of millions of dollars
to
protect people we vote out of office every four to six years because of
their incompetence.


In one of the last elections (1998) the re-election number for members of
Congress was something like 98%.

(Found it)
http://www.thisnation.com/question/016.html


It's been that way since the 1940's.




Everybody thinks Congress is doing a lousy job. The same everybody thinks
that there congress criters hung the moon.

"Gig 601XL Builder" wr.giacona@coxDOTnet wrote in message
news:_S3ie.3089$DC2.2593@okepread01...

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message

In one of the last elections (1998) the re-election number for members
of
Congress was something like 98%.

(Found it)
http://www.thisnation.com/question/016.html


It's been that way since the 1940's.




Everybody thinks Congress is doing a lousy job. The same everybody thinks
that there congress criters hung the moon.

It's all cyclical. Every one thinks government should cut funding for all
the "pet projects" except THEIR "pet projects".


Matt
---------------------
Matthew W. Barrow
Site-Fill Homes, LLC.
Montrose, CO

In one of the last elections (1998) the re-election number for members of
Congress was something like 98%.

It's been that way since the 1940's.

Most people are sheep.



--
__!__
Jay and Teresa Masino ___(_)___
http://www2.ari.net/jmasino ! ! !
http://www.oceancityairport.com
http://www.oc-adolfos.com

"Jay Masino" wrote in message
...
In one of the last elections (1998) the re-election number for members
of
Congress was something like 98%.

It's been that way since the 1940's.

Most people are sheep.

And as I mentioned in my other post:

[It's all cyclical. Every one thinks government should cut funding for all
the "pet projects" except THEIR "pet projects".]