A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

BRAC Logic....NAS Brunswick



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 17th 05, 04:43 AM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Andrew C. Toppan" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 15 May 2005 23:58:57 -0400, wrote:

may be reasons that neither you nor I have thought about. Providing
"back up" for Coast Guard is not an unreasonable possibility. I did


There is no Coast Guard air capability north of Cape Cod....which is
closing, too.


Which would be another decent reason for keeping New Brunswick open for use
on an as-needed basis.


not "run" the Air Force list but what other military air facilites
will exist in that part of the country? Would it make sense to keep
an NAF around for that reason?


There are no other military airfields within hundreds of miles. ME ANG
is at Bangor International, they're the closest other thing. There is
virtually no transient military traffic through Brunswick.

Remember "deterrence?" Lots of that was just "sitting around." It
was done with a purpose, mind you, and with a whole bunch of


So how do P-3s in Brunswick (or submarines in New London, or pick any
other base) "deter" terrorists from doing someting 9-11 style?
Deterrence requires a weapon that has the potential to do something
against the person being deterred.


Bullhocky. In the antiterrorist arena you can deter an attack by merely
being aware of your surroundings (i.e., use of ISR platforms like the P-3
you dismissed so quickly--you know, the ones that Clark acknowledged almost
three YEARS ago were already performing homeland defense operations?). You
need to attend a basic antiterrorism course before you make such ridiculous
claims.

Brooks


--
Andrew Toppan



  #2  
Old May 19th 05, 04:46 AM
Andrew C. Toppan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 16 May 2005 23:43:00 -0400, "Kevin Brooks"
wrote:

Which would be another decent reason for keeping New Brunswick open for use
on an as-needed basis.


New Brunswick? That's in Canada. Get a grip.


Bullhocky. In the antiterrorist arena you can deter an attack by merely
being aware of your surroundings (i.e., use of ISR platforms like the P-3


Yep, that sure worked well on 9/11....

--
Andrew Toppan --- --- "I speak only for myself"
"Haze Gray & Underway" - Naval History, DANFS, World Navies Today,
Photo Features, Military FAQs, and more -
http://www.hazegray.org/

  #3  
Old May 19th 05, 05:02 AM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Andrew C. Toppan" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 16 May 2005 23:43:00 -0400, "Kevin Brooks"
wrote:

Which would be another decent reason for keeping New Brunswick open for
use
on an as-needed basis.


New Brunswick? That's in Canada. Get a grip.


Oh, touche! Yeah, I brainfarted and used the "New" instead of NAS. Mea
freakin' culpa. Now when are you gonna 'fess up to incorrectly stating that
P-3's have never had/don't have any homeland defense mission?



Bullhocky. In the antiterrorist arena you can deter an attack by merely
being aware of your surroundings (i.e., use of ISR platforms like the P-3


Yep, that sure worked well on 9/11....


Uhmmm...if you had not noticed, our *lack* of adequate situational awareness
contributed to that outcome, not the other way around. Now, come on and give
us some more gems of your vast anti/counter-terrorism experience and/or
knowledge, Andrew... You are beginning to sound a bit like Henry J.
again....

Brooks


--
Andrew Toppan



  #4  
Old May 19th 05, 05:32 AM
Arved Sandstrom
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Andrew C. Toppan" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 16 May 2005 23:43:00 -0400, "Kevin Brooks"
wrote:

Which would be another decent reason for keeping New Brunswick open for

use
on an as-needed basis.


New Brunswick? That's in Canada. Get a grip.


Is it safe to assume that neither of you will be bowling, throwing darts, or
playing badminton any time soon? That is to say, as gleeful chums?

AHS


  #5  
Old May 19th 05, 08:15 PM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Arved Sandstrom" wrote in message
news:mFUie.2571$tt5.2509@edtnps90...
"Andrew C. Toppan" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 16 May 2005 23:43:00 -0400, "Kevin Brooks"
wrote:

Which would be another decent reason for keeping New Brunswick open for

use
on an as-needed basis.


New Brunswick? That's in Canada. Get a grip.


Is it safe to assume that neither of you will be bowling, throwing darts,
or
playing badminton any time soon? That is to say, as gleeful chums?


It probably would not be a lot of fun. I doubt Andrew even knows which end
of a bowling ball he is supposed to point at the badminton net while trying
to avoid those pesky darts...

Brooks


AHS




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BRAC 2005 List Joe Delphi Naval Aviation 4 February 23rd 05 06:11 PM
A BRAC list, NOT! John Carrier Naval Aviation 1 December 18th 04 10:45 PM
logic of IO-360 100hr injector inspection 93-02-05 Robert M. Gary Piloting 2 November 30th 04 04:13 PM
"Why Raptor? The Logic of Buying the World's Best Fighter" Mike Military Aviation 0 August 11th 04 03:20 PM
Logic behind day VFR Dillon Pyron Home Built 8 April 1st 04 04:00 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.