![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 May 2005 19:52:12 -0700, "Robert M. Gary"
wrote: "Why Choose a Turbo-Normalizer Instead of a Turbo-Booster?" http://www.m-20turbos.com/choose.htm Simple really. I could add a turbo normalizer to my engine while changing little else. If I added a turbocharger, I'd have to put in lower compression pistons, but depending on the STC could get more HP. IOW, you can basically add the turbonormalizer to almost any engine, but you can't do that with a turbocharger. If you limit the boost of the turbocharger you have just turned it into a turbonormalizer. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Duo Discus Turbo - Texas, USA | Mark Zivley | Soaring | 2 | May 4th 05 11:34 PM |
turbo stc? | The Weiss Family | Owning | 21 | October 3rd 04 10:35 PM |
Turbo prop AT-6/SNJ? | frank may | Military Aviation | 11 | September 5th 04 02:51 PM |
Turbo 182: correct mixture for final approach at high altitude? | Barry Klein | Piloting | 38 | January 15th 04 03:25 AM |
A36 Bonanza turbo prop | Jeff | Owning | 46 | January 7th 04 02:37 PM |