A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

FAA shares blame also



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 23rd 05, 11:35 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...

If it weren't for the fact that it will go broke at some point, SS is a
great deal from an investment perspective assuming you live very long in
retirement.


Exactly. Ponzi schemes would be great if not for the fact that they don't
work.


  #2  
Old May 24th 05, 02:14 AM
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...

If it weren't for the fact that it will go broke at some point, SS is a
great deal from an investment perspective assuming you live very long in
retirement.



Exactly. Ponzi schemes would be great if not for the fact that they don't
work.



Well, they work for the folks in first ... just like SS. :-)

Matt
  #3  
Old May 24th 05, 02:27 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...

Well, they work for the folks in first ... just like SS. :-)


Social Security IS a Ponzi scheme.


  #4  
Old May 24th 05, 02:35 AM
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...

Well, they work for the folks in first ... just like SS. :-)



Social Security IS a Ponzi scheme.




Never said it wasn't. I just said that even Ponzi schemes work for
some, just not for all ... and not for long.


Matt
  #5  
Old May 24th 05, 02:53 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...

Never said it wasn't. I just said that even Ponzi schemes work for some,
just not for all ... and not for long.


So in other words, you said Ponzi schemes work just like a Ponzi scheme.


  #6  
Old May 24th 05, 11:30 AM
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...

Never said it wasn't. I just said that even Ponzi schemes work for some,
just not for all ... and not for long.



So in other words, you said Ponzi schemes work just like a Ponzi scheme.



That is right. They work for the orginators of the scheme, but not the
suckers who come later. With SS, the baby boomers, and the post-baby
boomers likely will be the suckers. The government has deep pockets so
they can perpetuate the scheme much longer than other entities could.


Matt
  #7  
Old May 24th 05, 02:23 PM
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...

Never said it wasn't. I just said that even Ponzi schemes work for

some,
just not for all ... and not for long.



So in other words, you said Ponzi schemes work just like a Ponzi

scheme.



That is right. They work for the orginators of the scheme, but not the
suckers who come later. With SS, the baby boomers, and the post-baby
boomers likely will be the suckers. The government has deep pockets so
they can perpetuate the scheme much longer than other entities could.


They also have guns and badges.


  #8  
Old May 24th 05, 02:55 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...

The government has deep pockets so they can perpetuate the scheme much
longer than other entities could.


The government cannot perpetuate the scheme, SS will either be altered
drastically or collapse. The scheme persists temporarily only because
citizens are forced to participate. I chuckle when I hear Congress Critters
claim SS is a very popular program. If it's so popular then why not make it
voluntary?


  #9  
Old May 24th 05, 02:35 AM
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...

If it weren't for the fact that it will go broke at some point, SS is a
great deal from an investment perspective assuming you live very long in
retirement.



Exactly. Ponzi schemes would be great if not for the fact that they

don't
work.



Well, they work for the folks in first ... just like SS. :-)


You do know, don't you, the SS was developed using a Ponzi scheme model. It
didn't just HAPPEN that way, it was intended that way since its conception.




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Air Shares Elite and Cirrus Sr22 Teranews \(Daily\) Owning 4 September 5th 04 05:28 PM
Boeing shares rose as high as $38.90, up $2.86, in morning trade! Larry Dighera Military Aviation 0 October 29th 03 08:49 PM
DG 808B shares available at Omarama New Zealand Paul Soaring 0 September 24th 03 11:00 PM
ATC stand and deliver? (was: O'Hare Controllers Raise Alarm, Blame Small Planes journeyman Piloting 13 July 11th 03 05:55 PM
O'Hare Controllers Raise Alarm, Blame Small Planes Larry Dighera Piloting 1 July 10th 03 03:56 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.