![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actual conditions outrank FSS or DUATS. Think about it.
I did. Then I remembered lawyers. -- Dave A Aging Student Pilot -I can gather all the news I need on the weather report- "Dave Stadt" wrote in message ... "Dave A." wrote in message news:HEkle.274$zb.28@trndny02... We are taught for the Oral exam that the only way you can prove you took off into legal minimums for VFR flight is to obtain a weather briefing from the FSS or DUATS. How does FSS or DUATS know what the conditions are at the thousands of airports without weather reporting? It is only the FSS or DUATS weather report for that time that determines if you are legally allowed to be flying based on your restrictions, whatever they may be. Your local tower or TV station might tell you the weather is one thing, but if the FSS says it isn't you could be in violation. I don't know what kind of documentation you are looking for, but I have been told that I will be wrong if I don't answer the question with the FAA examiner this way. -- Dave A Aging Student Pilot |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave A." wrote in message news:fcwle.3544$zb.3181@trndny01... Actual conditions outrank FSS or DUATS. Think about it. I did. Then I remembered lawyers. So you would launch if actual conditions were below minimums but FSS said things were OK. Interesting, but not condusive to a long life. -- Dave A Aging Student Pilot -I can gather all the news I need on the weather report- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Stadt wrote:
So you would launch if actual conditions were below minimums but FSS said things were OK. Interesting, but not condusive to a long life. I think he meant the other way 'round. When I was based at Kupper, the nearest reporting station was Newark. Newark's on the coast and frequently has IMC when Kupper is VFR. I remember an FAA inspector telling a safety meeting group that we were technically illegal if we flew VFR when EWR was IFR. I don't think any of us changed our habits as a result of that statement. I certainly didn't. George Patterson Why do men's hearts beat faster, knees get weak, throats become dry, and they think irrationally when a woman wears leather clothing? Because she smells like a new truck. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article x2xle.2405$Lb.1000@trndny05, George Patterson wrote:
Kupper is VFR. I remember an FAA inspector telling a safety meeting group that we were technically illegal if we flew VFR when EWR was IFR. I don't think any of us changed our habits as a result of that statement. I certainly didn't. Well, quite possibly because the FAA inspector was technically wrong. Whether you're legal VFR or not depends on the conditions at your point in space and time, not what some weather station several miles away might be reporting. Otherwise, the corollary of what the FAA inspector says is that you are technically LEGAL if it's 200 and 1/2 so long as EWR is reporting VFR. -- Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net "Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, quite possibly because the FAA inspector was technically wrong.
Whether you're legal VFR or not depends on the conditions at your point in space and time, not what some weather station several miles away might be reporting. The question was, what is a legal briefing and where is it stated in the regulations. If you take off in the conditions stated by George Patternson you are technically flying illegal. The philosophizing on the subject aside, all indications given by the FAA is that the FSS and DUATS weather and NOTAMS are your only proof should legal proceedings take place that you followed 91.103. Being that the FAA is the regulatory body, they will impose the fine based on their judgments. -- Dave A Aging Student Pilot -I can gather all the news I need on the weather report- "Dylan Smith" wrote in message ... In article x2xle.2405$Lb.1000@trndny05, George Patterson wrote: Kupper is VFR. I remember an FAA inspector telling a safety meeting group that we were technically illegal if we flew VFR when EWR was IFR. I don't think any of us changed our habits as a result of that statement. I certainly didn't. Otherwise, the corollary of what the FAA inspector says is that you are technically LEGAL if it's 200 and 1/2 so long as EWR is reporting VFR. -- Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net "Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee" |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, Dave A. posted:
Well, quite possibly because the FAA inspector was technically wrong. Whether you're legal VFR or not depends on the conditions at your point in space and time, not what some weather station several miles away might be reporting. The question was, what is a legal briefing and where is it stated in the regulations. If you take off in the conditions stated by George Patternson you are technically flying illegal. Then, why do Pireps trump briefings? Whether one is "flying illegal" is determined by the conditions where one is flying, not the conditions elsewhere. The philosophizing on the subject aside, all indications given by the FAA is that the FSS and DUATS weather and NOTAMS are your only proof should legal proceedings take place that you followed 91.103. This is a somewhat different matter. Should one need such proof, FSS and DUATS may be the only sources that are not to be challenged in court. However, if you crash at a fogged-in airport because FSS and/or DUATS report CAVU elsewhere, good luck trying to use those reports to defend yourself. Neil |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave A." wrote in message
news:hzCle.4554$Fb.1419@trndny07... The philosophizing on the subject aside, all indications given by the FAA is that the FSS and DUATS weather and NOTAMS are your only proof should legal proceedings take place that you followed 91.103. FSS and DUATS are the only services whose use is supposed to generate *automatic* proof of the briefing, with no further effort on your part. But if you get the same information elsewhere, you *may* still be able to prove that you did so (witnesses, notes, saved or deleted data on your computer, etc.). --Gary |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"George Patterson" wrote in message
news:x2xle.2405$Lb.1000@trndny05... Dave Stadt wrote: So you would launch if actual conditions were below minimums but FSS said things were OK. Interesting, but not condusive to a long life. I think he meant the other way 'round. Thanks George, thought I was going crazy. -- Dave A Aging Student Pilot -I can gather all the news I need on the weather report- When I was based at Kupper, the nearest reporting station was Newark. Newark's on the coast and frequently has IMC when Kupper is VFR. I remember an FAA inspector telling a safety meeting group that we were technically illegal if we flew VFR when EWR was IFR. I don't think any of us changed our habits as a result of that statement. I certainly didn't. George Patterson Why do men's hearts beat faster, knees get weak, throats become dry, and they think irrationally when a woman wears leather clothing? Because she smells like a new truck. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So you would launch if actual conditions were below minimums but FSS said
things were OK. Interesting, but not condusive to a long life. No no, other way around. -- Dave A Aging Student Pilot -I can gather all the news I need on the weather report- "Dave Stadt" wrote in message ... "Dave A." wrote in message news:fcwle.3544$zb.3181@trndny01... Actual conditions outrank FSS or DUATS. Think about it. I did. Then I remembered lawyers. -- Dave A Aging Student Pilot -I can gather all the news I need on the weather report- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Light Sport Aircraft for Private Pilots (Long) | Jimbob | Owning | 17 | March 1st 05 03:01 AM |
Bush Pilots Fly-In. South Africa. | Bush Air | Home Built | 0 | May 25th 04 06:18 AM |
Older Pilots and Safety | Bob Johnson | Soaring | 5 | May 21st 04 01:08 AM |
UK pilots - please help by completeing a questionnaire | Chris Nicholas | Soaring | 0 | September 15th 03 01:44 PM |