![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gary Drescher wrote:
My point here, though, is that common sense doesn't resolve the conflict. Near my office is a road that crosses a couple of railroad tracks. South of the road's crossing of the tracks, there's a fence between the two tracks. Where that fence ends, next to the road, is a sign: Do not cross railroad tracks Unfortunately, that sign gives every appearance of requiring that one not follow the road (or the pedestrian way along the road) across the tracks. Although I've not checked, I'm reasonably sure that it is supposed to mean "cross tracks only at designated crossings". It irks me when people that author signs - or rules - cannot do so clearly and accurately. For what else are they being paid? - Andrew |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Carrying flight gear on the airlines | Peter MacPherson | Piloting | 20 | November 25th 04 12:29 AM |
World Class: Recent Great News | Charles Yeates | Soaring | 58 | March 19th 04 06:58 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
One Design viability? | Stewart Kissel | Soaring | 41 | December 10th 03 03:27 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |