![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One additional practical advantage to the fuselage
mounted TE: If you forget to remove the TE probe from the fin-mounted position and close the Cobra/Komet top with the glider inside the trailer, you'll end up with another bend in the TE probe. That won't happen with a fuselage-mounted TE probe. (Since I have a funky tube trailer, that isn't possible with my ship. So, it didn't happen to me.) Ray Lovinggood Carrboro, North Carolina, USA At 13:30 02 June 2005, Bill Daniels wrote: wrote in message roups.com... I have not received my soaring magazine yet this month but I hear there is an article dealing with fin mounted vs fuselage mounted TE probes. Anyone have thoughts on this issue? Richard www.craggyaero.com I read Dick's article with interest. He did his usual incredibly through experimental work to support the probe design. I see several advantages to the Johnson probe. 1. It's likely to be less sensitive to yaw with its single hole aft. 2. Shorter tubing runs that can be easily inspected and replaced if needed. 3. It eliminates the danger of breaking the fin mounted probe while installing/removing the tail dolly. 4. Possibly faster and more accurate vario response since acceleration and line capacity errors are reduced. 5, One less part to install (or forget) Bill Daniels |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
More long-range Spitfires and daylight Bomber Command raids, with added nationalistic abuse (was: #1 Jet of World War II) | The Revolution Will Not Be Televised | Military Aviation | 161 | September 25th 03 07:35 AM |