![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Bill wrote: I was told by a co-worker that a new Part 91-mandatory compliance reg has come out, requiring all airplanes to meet a min. climb gradient of 2.5% for second stage climb gradient, unless published otherwise. In other words, if no specific gradient is published for XYZ airport, then the airplane must be able to climb out at 2.5% minimum. I am unable to locate any regs or anything that address this, so if anyone has further info and the reg, AC circular, etc, please let me know It's not second-stage. That is a Part 25 performance requirement. Having said that, your friend is about right. There was a big NPRM a few months ago with lots of instrument procedures issues in it. One of the proposals was to make obstacle DPs mandatory for all IFR operations unless an ATC DP or radar vector is assigned. It can be argued that it has always been the case that any climb gradient on an ATC DP becomes regulatory if you accept the departure. Pretty much the same can be said for departure vectors. If the rule is adopted as proposed, presumably the obstacle DP will gain the same status as an ATC DP. If so, any stated CG will be regulatory. And, if no CG is stated, then 200 feet per mile, not 2.5%, would be regulatory. When, or if, the proposed rule will be adopted is something I don't know. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Newbie question on Rate of Climb | Wright1902Glider | Home Built | 0 | August 17th 04 03:48 PM |
Rate of climb | Dillon Pyron | Home Built | 3 | May 8th 04 01:08 PM |
Minimum rate of climb or descent | Aaron Kahn | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | July 25th 03 03:22 PM |