![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stupidly, I might attempt to use my 1950s-tech dual VORs to
"cross-check" my dual GPS-verified position, even though I know that they are exponentially less accurate instruments. Umm... I think he's saying that you've got a responsibillity to know where the VORs are, even if you don't use 'em. I remember reading that there is a statistical spike in mid-airs over VORs (because lots of people use them as intersections), and I imagine that driving across a victor airway without know that it's a high traffic corridor is kinda counterindicated. I always keep a vigillant scan, but... I'll use any data I have to keep 'big sky theory' in check. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Newbie Question - Vacuum vs Electric | Bill Denton | Aerobatics | 1 | April 15th 04 11:30 PM |
Pattern Entry Procedures - FAA Guidance | Bill Denton | Piloting | 15 | January 22nd 04 02:13 PM |
Stupid hp to thrust question | Mark | Home Built | 52 | December 9th 03 01:41 PM |
Stupid super cub question | Robert Loer | Home Built | 9 | November 22nd 03 05:28 PM |