A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Europeans flying on holiday - hysterical !



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 9th 05, 03:36 AM
TOliver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jeff Hacker" wrote in message
...

"mrtravel" wrote in message
om...


In the case of MRTC, AA clearly advertised that it was offering more
space. However, if you are booking though an online search engine, all
you would see is that carrier A is charging $30 more than carrier B for
Economy service on a 737.


I fly often on American and find the rates to be competitive with other
carriers on the same routes, depending on the day and time of day varying by
up to 100%. The MRTC didn't change any fares, simply provided more legroom,
as AA kept it's Economy fares the level with competition (other than WN
advance purchase/internet specials)

Someone posted that the legacy carriers charge a lot more. This is not
generally true in markets where they compete with low fare carriers.
Although some people aren't convinced the airlines are taking good
surveys, this logically makes no sense. Why would an airline purposely
put the seats back in if it was more profitable to leave them out and
charge more?


AA put the seats back in on their Caribbean and SAmerican routes, bot US
domestic or TransAtlantic which remain "MRTC"
Legend is that a research company told AA that travelers to the Islands and
SAmerica were natives with short legs or tourists who had no alterantives
except Latin American Airlines, some of which remain a bit primitive


In the case of American, they really do seem to believe that they can get
away with it. They are about as arrogant as any airline ever was.


Only "Half Arrogant", not in the domestic service where MRTC has helped to
keep'em afloat, especially with DL deflation of service and capacity. The
innocuous MD80 series remain 34" I believe.

TMO


  #2  
Old June 9th 05, 05:15 AM
Scott Skylane
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

TOliver wrote:
/snip/
AA put the seats back in on their Caribbean and SAmerican routes, bot US
domestic or TransAtlantic which remain "MRTC"
Legend is that a research company told AA that travelers to the Islands and
SAmerica were natives with short legs or tourists who had no alterantives
except Latin American Airlines, some of which remain a bit primitive


The
innocuous MD80 series remain 34" I believe.

TMO



According to seatguru.com, *all* of AA's planes will be converted back
to standard 31" coach pitch by the end of this month
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Passing of Richard Miller [email protected] Soaring 5 April 5th 05 01:54 AM
Mountain Flying Course: Colorado, Apr, Jun, Aug 2005 [email protected] Piloting 0 April 3rd 05 08:48 PM
Flying Holiday in Europe Udo Rumpf Soaring 17 March 23rd 05 03:08 PM
Ten Years of Flying Jay Honeck Piloting 20 February 19th 05 02:05 PM
Routine Aviation Career Guy Alcala Military Aviation 0 September 26th 04 12:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.