![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dan Luke" c172rgATbellsouthDOTnet wrote in message ...
"Dave" wrote: I don't want to lug a laptop into the plane. And, of course, for hard IFR, you can't legally use it anyway. ??? What's the legal problem? Maybe it's all in the interpretation, but 14 CFR 91.21 spells it out. The loophole may be item 5. But, what constitutes the operator making an informed decision that a laptop with the other associated equipment won't cause interference to the NAV and COM equipment? "(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, no person may operate, nor may any operator or pilot in command of an aircraft allow the operation of, any portable electronic device on any of the following U.S.-registered civil aircraft: (1) Aircraft operated by a holder of an air carrier operating certificate or an operating certificate; or (2) Any other aircraft while it is operated under IFR. (b) Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to -- (1) Portable voice recorders; (2) Hearing aids; (3) Heart pacemakers; (4) Electric shavers; or (5) Any other portable electronic device that the operator of the aircraft has determined will not cause interference with the navigation or communication system of the aircraft on which it is to be used. (c) In the case of an aircraft operated by a holder of an air carrier operating certificate or an operating certificate, the determination required by paragraph (b)(5) of this section shall be made by that operator of the aircraft on which the particular device is to be used. In the case of other aircraft, the determination may be made by the pilot in command or other operator of the aircraft. " |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave" wrote:
Maybe it's all in the interpretation, but 14 CFR 91.21 spells it out. I still don't see what that's got to do with "hard IFR." -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dan Luke" wrote in message ...
"Dave" wrote: Maybe it's all in the interpretation, but 14 CFR 91.21 spells it out. I still don't see what that's got to do with "hard IFR." my implication was that if you're flying "hard IFR", you're in IMC on an IFR flight plan, and would thus be subject to 91.21. Folks, I think this is a great product. I just wish they would integrate it with some cockpit MFD's (other than the gazillion dollar Garmin G1000 system) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave" wrote in message
m... my implication was that if you're flying "hard IFR", you're in IMC on an IFR flight plan, and would thus be subject to 91.21. 91.21 applies to all flight. If you think that WxWorx with a laptop is not legal for "hard IFR" (which most of us call "hard IMC") based on 91.21, then you think it is not legal under any circumstances. Do you really think that? Pete |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Duniho" wrote in message ...
"Dave" wrote in message m... my implication was that if you're flying "hard IFR", you're in IMC on an IFR flight plan, and would thus be subject to 91.21. 91.21 applies to all flight. If you think that WxWorx with a laptop is not legal for "hard IFR" (which most of us call "hard IMC") based on 91.21, then you think it is not legal under any circumstances. Do you really think that? Pete I, and many pilots I know, interpret this rule to mean that flying under part 91 on an IFR flight plan, it is illegal to use any portable electronics not FAA-approved. This rule says nothing about VFR operations. I think the issue at hand is if you are in the soup and using an 'unapproved' piece of electronic equipment that you really don't know for certain will or won't cause interferenec with your equipment, then you shouldn't be using it. Another idea may be that if you are fiddling with a laptop sitting in your lap, right seat or even a pedistal between seats, that's time that you're not focused on the instruments. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave" wrote in message
om... I, and many pilots I know, interpret this rule to mean that flying under part 91 on an IFR flight plan, it is illegal to use any portable electronics not FAA-approved. Sounds like you've changed your tune. Before, you were claiming the regulation prohibited use of electronics when flying "hard IFR". Now you've apparently figured out that only the flight rules under which the flight is made matter, and that the meteorological conditions are irrelevant. Glad you came around... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Perhaps I should clarify rather than change my tune. Hard IFR would
imply to me that you are flying under IFR. When the FAA says "under IFR", I take that to mean you are filed - regardless of whether the conditions warrant it. But an being on an IFR flight plan would not necessarily imply that the conditions are IMC. So, yeah - you could be flying an IFR plan(i.e. "under IFR") with perfectly good VFR conditions. The reg would indicate that *any*time you are on an IFR plan (i.e. "under IFR"), regardless of the weather, you can't use portable electronics. My original comment about not being able to use the laptop while in "hard IFR" implied that you are flying on an IFR plan (i.e. "under IFR"), hence under IFR regs and could not therefore legally use it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|