|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
June 10th 05, 09:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message ... That the clearance would be to SLI VOR, so either of the feeder fixes would have limited, if any, application in a lost comm situation. No, the clearance would be to the filed destination. 
|
|
#2
June 10th 05, 11:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: wrote in message ... That the clearance would be to SLI VOR, so either of the feeder fixes would have limited, if any, application in a lost comm situation. No, the clearance would be to the filed destination. No, that would be the clearance limit. The last clearance fix coming to KFUL from the west or northwest would be SLI. In the context of this thread: the last airway fix would be SLI, not WILMA. It's all academic anyway because routing over WILMA conflicts the SoCAL TEC routes.
|
|
#3
June 10th 05, 11:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message ... No, that would be the clearance limit. The clearance limit will be the filed destination.
|
|
#4
June 11th 05, 12:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: wrote in message ... No, that would be the clearance limit. The clearance limit will be the filed destination. That is what I said.
|
|
#5
June 11th 05, 02:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message ... That is what I said. No, you said the clearance would be to SLI VOR.
|
|
#6
June 11th 05, 05:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: wrote in message ... That is what I said. No, you said the clearance would be to SLI VOR. Here is the context of the thread, what I said to another person who is not playing your semantic games: Filing to WILMA would not be appropriate because, although it's a feeder fix for this approach, it is short of destination. If you were coming from the north it would be typical to file the prefered airway to SLI then direct. You don't have the option to proceed to ALBAS unless it's on your clearance route.
|
|
#7
June 11th 05, 05:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message ... Here is the context of the thread, what I said to another person who is not playing your semantic games: Filing to WILMA would not be appropriate because, although it's a feeder fix for this approach, it is short of destination. If you were coming from the north it would be typical to file the prefered airway to SLI then direct. You don't have the option to proceed to ALBAS unless it's on your clearance route. And here is a verbatim quote of your message: "That the clearance would be to SLI VOR, so either of the feeder fixes would have limited, if any, application in a lost comm situation." What you wrote is incorrect. The clearance would not be to SLI VOR, it would be to the destination airport.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
| Procedure turn required? | Yossarian | Piloting | 85 | July 6th 05 08:12 PM |
| Sports class tasking | [email protected] | Soaring | 12 | April 25th 05 01:32 PM |
| Agent86's List of Misconceptions of FAA Procedures Zero for 15 Putz!!! | copertopkiller | Military Aviation | 11 | April 20th 04 02:17 AM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Hybrid Mode
