A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Few Observations



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #2  
Old June 11th 05, 06:50 PM
John Ammeter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ron,

No Names but when I was getting my RV-6 ready for the FAA
inspection I was told by the FAA to have an A&P do the
equilvalent of a 100 hour inspection on the plane.

It rapidly became obvious to me that I knew more than the
A&P at least as far as "systems" went. I had to explain to
him how the ignition switch grounds one of the mags when
turned to the "start" position. There were a few other
"things" he didn't know...

At least I got the signature and the FAA was happy.

John


On Sat, 11 Jun 2005 10:25:23 -0700, Ron Wanttaja
wrote:

On 11 Jun 2005 09:53:17 -0700, wrote:

The A&P/IA who signed off this Alon as airworthy the last annual
pencil-whipped the work by slathering ugly pancakes of JB Weld around
the leaky rivets on the wing tanks.


A buddy of mine bought a used Cherokee. When he got home with it (2000-mile
trip), he discovered, among other jewels, that the alternator belt said "NAPA
AUTO PARTS," and the landing-light connector pair had been replaced with a bulb
socket and a bulb with the glass smashed away and wires soldered to the
connections. In addition to a bunch of corrosion, he found that all the wing
fuel tank vents had been cut off flush with wing, covered with screws, and
painted over.

The airplane not only had a current annual, but my friend had hired a different
A&P for a pre-buy.....

Ron "Another Case Study" Wanttaja


  #3  
Old June 11th 05, 08:12 PM
Don Hammer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



A buddy of mine bought a used Cherokee. When he got home with it (2000-mile
trip), he discovered, among other jewels, that the alternator belt said "NAPA
AUTO PARTS," and the landing-light connector pair had been replaced with a bulb
socket and a bulb with the glass smashed away and wires soldered to the
connections. In addition to a bunch of corrosion, he found that all the wing
fuel tank vents had been cut off flush with wing, covered with screws, and
painted over.

The airplane not only had a current annual, but my friend had hired a different
A&P for a pre-buy.....


Some observations from an older A&P / IA -

It is a sad commentary on the condition of the field, but I think we
are getting what we have asked for. Over and over on this NG and
others I read owners complaints about the cost of maintenance on their
personal aircraft and the quality of work they get.

In general there is a direct corollary to what a person earns and the
quality of work they provide. As an example let's look at the pilot
side of things and the pecking order on wages and skill level -

Major corporation
Major airline
Smaller airline
Fractional's
Commuter airline
Charter

I can tell you without any hesitation that the best and brightest are
not flying charter Lear Jets for a living. There is no difference
with maintenance personnel. That does not mean there are not any
exceptions, but I have determined, in general, that small aircraft
maintainers are either near retirement, new in the industry, or
has-been's that can't find work elsewhere.

As part of my business, I hire personnel for corporate flight
departments. In order to get the best, I typically set the salaries
of a Gulfstream-type mechanic at $75K to 95K depending on the area of
the country. I recently placed a DOM at $105K. These are not the same
quality of technicians that are working out of the back of their truck
or for Bob's Cessna Shop in Grass Strip, Kansas.

My suggestion -

If I were to buy a light aircraft, I would find the most expensive
factory shop I could find and pay them for a complete Annual
Inspection and supervise them well. There is no FAA definition for a
pre-buy, but there is for an Annual. I would set the ground rules and
make sure they understand my expectations. At a minimum, ask to
review their checklist and make sure you are happy with it. If they
don't have a checklist, go elsewhere as an Annual requires one.

I don't think any of you would take your Lexus to the local gas
station for repairs, so why do owners of $75,000 airplanes insist on
going to Bob's? I don't have a clue, but it's something to think
about.


  #4  
Old June 11th 05, 11:06 PM
Rip
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well Don, for every rule there's an exception. Recently (as in last
week) an acquaintance purchased a low time Baron and had the Raytheon
folks on the west coast do a "complete" pre-buy and annual on it, to the
tune of $55,000. During the flight home here to Connecticut, none of the
radios worked, the co-pilot's side rudder pedal was discovered to be
disconnected, and a persistently reported (by the previous owner) oil
leak turned out to be a 6 inch crack in one of the crankcases. Obscene.

I'll take a conscientious one-man shop over that scenario any day.

Rip

Don Hammer wrote:
A buddy of mine bought a used Cherokee. When he got home with it (2000-mile
trip), he discovered, among other jewels, that the alternator belt said "NAPA
AUTO PARTS," and the landing-light connector pair had been replaced with a bulb
socket and a bulb with the glass smashed away and wires soldered to the
connections. In addition to a bunch of corrosion, he found that all the wing
fuel tank vents had been cut off flush with wing, covered with screws, and
painted over.

The airplane not only had a current annual, but my friend had hired a different
A&P for a pre-buy.....



Some observations from an older A&P / IA -

It is a sad commentary on the condition of the field, but I think we
are getting what we have asked for. Over and over on this NG and
others I read owners complaints about the cost of maintenance on their
personal aircraft and the quality of work they get.

In general there is a direct corollary to what a person earns and the
quality of work they provide. As an example let's look at the pilot
side of things and the pecking order on wages and skill level -

Major corporation
Major airline
Smaller airline
Fractional's
Commuter airline
Charter

I can tell you without any hesitation that the best and brightest are
not flying charter Lear Jets for a living. There is no difference
with maintenance personnel. That does not mean there are not any
exceptions, but I have determined, in general, that small aircraft
maintainers are either near retirement, new in the industry, or
has-been's that can't find work elsewhere.

As part of my business, I hire personnel for corporate flight
departments. In order to get the best, I typically set the salaries
of a Gulfstream-type mechanic at $75K to 95K depending on the area of
the country. I recently placed a DOM at $105K. These are not the same
quality of technicians that are working out of the back of their truck
or for Bob's Cessna Shop in Grass Strip, Kansas.

My suggestion -

If I were to buy a light aircraft, I would find the most expensive
factory shop I could find and pay them for a complete Annual
Inspection and supervise them well. There is no FAA definition for a
pre-buy, but there is for an Annual. I would set the ground rules and
make sure they understand my expectations. At a minimum, ask to
review their checklist and make sure you are happy with it. If they
don't have a checklist, go elsewhere as an Annual requires one.

I don't think any of you would take your Lexus to the local gas
station for repairs, so why do owners of $75,000 airplanes insist on
going to Bob's? I don't have a clue, but it's something to think
about.



  #5  
Old June 11th 05, 11:39 PM
Kyle Boatright
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Don Hammer" wrote in message
news:1118517137.02e998fe27851901b8e26c46364fa35d@t eranews...



snip

My suggestion -

If I were to buy a light aircraft, I would find the most expensive
factory shop I could find and pay them for a complete Annual
Inspection and supervise them well. There is no FAA definition for a
pre-buy, but there is for an Annual. I would set the ground rules and
make sure they understand my expectations. At a minimum, ask to
review their checklist and make sure you are happy with it. If they
don't have a checklist, go elsewhere as an Annual requires one.

I don't think any of you would take your Lexus to the local gas
station for repairs, so why do owners of $75,000 airplanes insist on
going to Bob's? I don't have a clue, but it's something to think
about.


It's amazing, isn't it? The dealership where I take my Honda charges about
$60/hr, and you pay by "book" time. Generally, a good mechanic can beat the
book by 25% or more, so you're really paying something like $80/hr.

My AI charges $45/hr, and charges for the actual time a job takes. Sure,
his overhead is less than the Honda dealer's, but his exposure to liability
is certainly higher, and he's spent a whole lot more time on his training
than most of the guys turning wrenches for the auto dealer. Beyond that, if
the auto shop messes up a repair or inspection on my car, it isn't likely to
be catastrophic, whereas there the AI or A&P needs to get it right the first
time, or it may cause a seriously bad situation.

Maybe the difference in the shop rates between auto repair and aircraft
repair shops has something to do with the fact that a well maintained,
reliabile automobile is a necessity in today's society, so we can
psycologically justify paying a premium price, as long as the service and
quality of work are good. On the other hand, many GA aircraft are lifestyle
accessories. As such, if they became too expensive, we'll just sell the
airplane and find another hobby. Sad to say, but maybe the AI's are
commanding all the market will bear...



  #6  
Old June 11th 05, 10:19 PM
W P Dixon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Don,
I think you make some very valid points. I never even looked at a GA
aircraft until I retired. They just could not pay enough. Who here would
work for 8-15 an hour when if they are good at what they do can make 20-30
an hour? Not I , and as the old contracting saying goes" Have toolbox, will
travel".
So now..retirement! Now I am looking for planes to build or restore for
myself. I sure hope I can help someone down the road,...but unless that
situation comes up I'll be breaking out the rivet guns on my own stuff.

Patrick
student SPL
aircraft structural mech

"Don Hammer" wrote in message
news:1118517137.02e998fe27851901b8e26c46364fa35d@t eranews...


A buddy of mine bought a used Cherokee. When he got home with it
(2000-mile
trip), he discovered, among other jewels, that the alternator belt said
"NAPA
AUTO PARTS," and the landing-light connector pair had been replaced with a
bulb
socket and a bulb with the glass smashed away and wires soldered to the
connections. In addition to a bunch of corrosion, he found that all the
wing
fuel tank vents had been cut off flush with wing, covered with screws, and
painted over.

The airplane not only had a current annual, but my friend had hired a
different
A&P for a pre-buy.....


Some observations from an older A&P / IA -

It is a sad commentary on the condition of the field, but I think we
are getting what we have asked for. Over and over on this NG and
others I read owners complaints about the cost of maintenance on their
personal aircraft and the quality of work they get.

In general there is a direct corollary to what a person earns and the
quality of work they provide. As an example let's look at the pilot
side of things and the pecking order on wages and skill level -

Major corporation
Major airline
Smaller airline
Fractional's
Commuter airline
Charter

I can tell you without any hesitation that the best and brightest are
not flying charter Lear Jets for a living. There is no difference
with maintenance personnel. That does not mean there are not any
exceptions, but I have determined, in general, that small aircraft
maintainers are either near retirement, new in the industry, or
has-been's that can't find work elsewhere.

As part of my business, I hire personnel for corporate flight
departments. In order to get the best, I typically set the salaries
of a Gulfstream-type mechanic at $75K to 95K depending on the area of
the country. I recently placed a DOM at $105K. These are not the same
quality of technicians that are working out of the back of their truck
or for Bob's Cessna Shop in Grass Strip, Kansas.

My suggestion -

If I were to buy a light aircraft, I would find the most expensive
factory shop I could find and pay them for a complete Annual
Inspection and supervise them well. There is no FAA definition for a
pre-buy, but there is for an Annual. I would set the ground rules and
make sure they understand my expectations. At a minimum, ask to
review their checklist and make sure you are happy with it. If they
don't have a checklist, go elsewhere as an Annual requires one.

I don't think any of you would take your Lexus to the local gas
station for repairs, so why do owners of $75,000 airplanes insist on
going to Bob's? I don't have a clue, but it's something to think
about.



  #7  
Old June 12th 05, 01:06 AM
Smitty
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I wish it were that simple, but I don't think it is. Others have made
the auto mechanic analogy and I'll add my experience to that. My
mechanic works in a filthy poorly lit garage (pronounced "shack") at the
end of a rutted gravel driveway in a seedy part of town. He's the best
damn mechanic in town at any price. You can't find his name in the phone
book, and you can't get his number from information, because he's got
more work than three people could do. If you walk in the door and he
doesn't know you, he'll likely greet you with profanity and send you
away. I've had many many friends who've had their car fixed by him for
less than $100 after the big fancy luxury dealers had charged them $700
or more to NOT fix them. He KNOWS cars.

Then there was the "60 minutes" (IIRC) piece just a few years ago that
secretly filmed major airline maintenance crews napping for hours at a
time in the first class section of the airplanes they were supposed to
be inspecting and maintaining. After the nap, they just get up and check
off all the boxes on the form...NOT an isolated incident.

Attitude, attention to detail, pride in workmanship -- I've never seen
an indication that they're related to how much you pay someone. I've got
$8 / hr. workers who are every damn bit as good in every measure as the
$20 / hr. guys.


In article 1118517137.02e998fe27851901b8e26c46364fa35d@teran ews,
Don Hammer wrote:



Some observations from an older A&P / IA -

It is a sad commentary on the condition of the field, but I think we
are getting what we have asked for. Over and over on this NG and
others I read owners complaints about the cost of maintenance on their
personal aircraft and the quality of work they get.

In general there is a direct corollary to what a person earns and the
quality of work they provide. As an example let's look at the pilot
side of things and the pecking order on wages and skill level -

Major corporation
Major airline
Smaller airline
Fractional's
Commuter airline
Charter


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Prop balancing and assorted observations - long Dave Hyde Home Built 10 June 27th 04 01:08 AM
Observations on the War No SPAM, Please Military Aviation 2 March 16th 04 04:41 AM
17 Dec 03 -- Some Observations Jim Weir General Aviation 0 December 28th 03 10:25 AM
Observations about oil leaks Ben Jackson Owning 5 October 9th 03 11:03 PM
And they say the automated Weather Station problems "ASOS" are insignificant because only light aircraft need Weather Observations and forecasts... Roy Piloting 4 July 12th 03 04:03 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.