A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

How come GPS reads different



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 12th 05, 04:11 PM
Aluckyguess
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Its a 296. It seems the like the higher I go the farther off it is.
I am one to think the GPS would be more accurate than the altimeter.
I was thinking that we get incorrect altimeter settings
"Casey Wilson" N2310D @ gmail.com wrote in message
news:x1Pqe.2896$9a1.185@trnddc01...

"Aluckyguess" wrote in message
...
I am getting over 500ft. difference and more.
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...
Aluckyguess wrote:
How come the GPS reads a different altitude than the Altimeter?

For many reasons. The main reason is that they derive altitude by two
completely different methods and this inevitably introduces errors. Then
each method has its own inherent errors.

Even two altimeters side by side won't read the same altitude other than
by accident.


Matt


The number of sattelites being received is one of the variables -- how
many are you registering on the GPS? What brand/model is the GPS. Is the
GPS certified for navigation? Does the GPS have a Kohlsman equivalent
input? What are the altitude specifications of the GPS? Are you comparing
it to an altimeter in an airplane? Is the calibration data on the
altimeter valid? Have you compared the altimeter to the GPS while parked
at a known reference (i.e., the benchmark of your local airport)? My
Magellan handheld takes about five mintues of averaging to get a
reasonably close altitude correlation -- how much time are you giving
yours?

Bottom line, forget the GPS altitude reading, dial in the local pressure
data into the airplane's altimeter and trust it.



  #2  
Old June 12th 05, 05:13 PM
Fred G. Black
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Aluckyguess wrote:
Its a 296. It seems the like the higher I go the farther off it is.
I am one to think the GPS would be more accurate than the altimeter.
I was thinking that we get incorrect altimeter settings


The altimeter is only "accurate" when the temperature profile of the
airmass is equal to the ISA standard atmosphere. The rest of the time,
there will be some error which increases with altitude (wrt wherever the
source for the altimeter setting is located). This isn't a concern for
en-route operations since everybody's altimeter has the same "error".
It can be a concern for terrain clearance in the mountains or in some
cases instrument approaches in cold weather since the altimeter reads
higher than the plane actually is.
  #3  
Old June 12th 05, 05:28 PM
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Fred G. Black wrote:

This isn't a concern for
en-route operations since everybody's altimeter has the same "error". It
can be a concern for terrain clearance in the mountains or in some cases
instrument approaches in cold weather since the altimeter reads higher
than the plane actually is.


No concern, either. When IMC, there is a safety margin built into the
approaches, and when VMC, there are windows in the copckpit.

Pneumatic altimeters are reliable, independant of any infrastructure and
work without electricity.

Stefan
  #4  
Old June 12th 05, 06:23 PM
Fred G. Black
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Stefan wrote:
Fred G. Black wrote:

This isn't a concern for en-route operations since everybody's
altimeter has the same "error". It can be a concern for terrain
clearance in the mountains or in some cases instrument approaches in
cold weather since the altimeter reads higher than the plane actually is.



No concern, either. When IMC, there is a safety margin built into the
approaches, and when VMC, there are windows in the copckpit.

Pneumatic altimeters are reliable, independant of any infrastructure and
work without electricity.

Stefan


There is a buffer in the procedure design however given that cold
temperature corrections are published (at least in Canada, ref CAP GEN
p19), it's not unreasonable to assume that there are situations where
they should be used.

Fred.
  #5  
Old June 12th 05, 07:01 PM
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Fred G. Black wrote:

There is a buffer in the procedure design however given that cold
temperature corrections are published (at least in Canada, ref CAP GEN
p19), it's not unreasonable to assume that there are situations where
they should be used.


Of course. That's one more reason why you must pass a test to get the
license.

Stefan
  #6  
Old June 12th 05, 07:16 PM
Dan Luke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Stefan" wrote:
Pneumatic altimeters are reliable,


Most of the time.

In very cold weather, you can run into something by relying on a
pneumatic altimeter.
--
Dan
C172RG at BFM


  #7  
Old June 12th 05, 07:23 PM
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dan Luke wrote:

In very cold weather, you can run into something by relying on a
pneumatic altimeter.


Pssst, I'll tell you a secret: All that stuff you had to learn to pass
the written was somehow linked to real life.

Stefan
  #8  
Old June 12th 05, 07:43 PM
Dan Luke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Stefan" wrote:
Pssst, I'll tell you a secret: All that stuff you had to learn to pass
the written was somehow linked to real life.


Really?

Gosh!

--
Dan

"How can an idiot be a policeman? Answer me that!"
- Chief Inspector Dreyfus


  #9  
Old June 13th 05, 02:42 PM
Guillermo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Does anybody know a quick rule of thumb about how much the altitude changes
with non-standard temperature?
I guess is also has to have in consideration that the airport altimeter
setting is also kinda "corrected".
I.E., you are flying at 4000 ft, then if you set up the altimeter setting
for an airport at 3800', you'll be far more accurate than if you set it up
for an airport at 1000' (assuming that the atmosphere is exactly the same).
or, in other words, the closer you are to the airport altitude, the more
accurate your altitude will be.


"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...

"Stefan" wrote:
Pneumatic altimeters are reliable,


Most of the time.

In very cold weather, you can run into something by relying on a
pneumatic altimeter.
--
Dan
C172RG at BFM




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GREAT AVIATION READS Cribsheet Piloting 1 September 12th 04 02:51 AM
GREAT AVIATION READS Cribsheet Rotorcraft 0 September 10th 04 06:06 PM
GREAT AVIATION READS Cribsheet Military Aviation 0 September 7th 04 06:37 PM
When the ASI Reads Below Zero BTIZ Piloting 11 August 23rd 04 04:57 PM
Newsweek Reads RAM! Bob McKellar Military Aviation 0 February 17th 04 02:10 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.