![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob,
This one certainly has me curious as to the cause. I've got very limited experience in fanjets, but I've flown them at max operating altitude and consider it a normal operation. In the turbojet 20-series Lears we regularly went to FL450 in the 23 and 24B (usually after one hour of flight) to get the fuel burns as low as possible when hauling freight (plus, back then, there was nobody up that high and we always got direct). In one version of the 25 we could go to FL510 although even when very light, the climb rate going through 490 was so slow we wondered whether we'd make 510 before time to start down (and, as you know, you could see the curvature of the earth). I did lose an engine at FL450 in a 24B when the captain moved the power levers fairly quickly and an old fuel control unit couldn't handle it at that altitude, flaming out the engine. We got a relight at 17,000 although, as I recall, the relight envelope was supposed to go to 25,000 (let's just say maintenance at that organization was not exactly top notch - long out of business). As a result, I'm curious as to what would cause both engines to go quiet - the only common system is fuel, although I don't know the CRJ systems at all and wonder whether there is/are any procedure(s) that must be followed above a certain altitude regarding pumps or if the company regularly flew so low that they didn't put in any additives such as PRIST to prevent ice in the fuel. Have to contact a CRJ captain friend of mine and see what she says. Also wondering why the relight was unsuccessful...just doesn't make sense, jet engines are so darn simple in operation - add fuel, ignite and go. Also wondering why they couldn't make an airport from 410 in central Missouri. The overheating comment on this thread is laughable. And I thought I'd heard all of the nutty theories of aircraft accidents. Or maybe it was some localized heavy gravity that shortened the glide range.... Your thoughts? Warmest regards, Rick |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Palo Alto airport, potential long-term problems... | [email protected] | Piloting | 7 | June 6th 05 11:32 PM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | November 1st 03 06:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | October 1st 03 07:27 AM |
Where to soar near Jefferson City - Missouri? | Peter | Soaring | 2 | September 15th 03 03:29 PM |