![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sport Pilot wrote:
Using 170 pounds per person is supposed to be a legit method of estimating the weight. Even the FAA doesn't expect you to carry a scale and weigh the passengers and cargo. Esitmating is supposed to be legit. So you could underestimate and be over the gross weight. It's been my experience most aircraft are more sensitive to balance than weight. Some aircraft are famous for their carrying ability... the Cherokee Six, Cessna C-182, and Cessna C-210 come to mind. Supposedly they'll fly if you can get the doors shut. I know for a fact that the Cherokee Six and the C-210 will carry six people, full fuel , dive gear (less tanks) and baggage for a four day stay. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN VE |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rolling a Non Aerobat 150 | Jose | Piloting | 1 | May 2nd 05 03:59 PM |
Rolling a Non Aerobat 150 | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 1 | April 29th 05 07:31 PM |
Rolling a Non Aerobat 150 | kage | Owning | 0 | April 29th 05 04:26 AM |
Rolling a Non Aerobat 150 | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 4 | April 28th 05 05:06 PM |
??Build rolling tool chest? | Michael Horowitz | Owning | 15 | January 27th 05 04:56 AM |