|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
June 15th 05, 09:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
No. But I've seen alot of ruckus they are creating.
|
|
#2
June 17th 05, 03:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Skylune" wrote in message lkaboutaviation.com... No. But I've seen alot of ruckus they are creating. Is that where you found your inspiration?
|
|
#3
June 17th 05, 03:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
No. But I heartily support there efforts, and it is very encouraging that
the Massachusetts court has chosen to hear this issue after the AOPA/FAA cabal tried to nix it. People should not be driven into their basements so that pilots can practice stunts over their homes. Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know all about the FARs and how the pilots claim they are flying legally..... Now, lets see what the courts have to say.
|
|
#4
June 17th 05, 03:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Skylune" wrote in message lkaboutaviation.com... No. But I heartily support there efforts, I'm not at all surprised. and it is very encouraging that the Massachusetts court has chosen to hear this issue after the AOPA/FAA cabal tried to nix it. How is that encouraging? People should not be driven into their basements so that pilots can practice stunts over their homes. People aren't driven into their basements so that pilots can practice stunts over their homes. Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know all about the FARs That seems unlikely. and how the pilots claim they are flying legally..... That seems likely. Now, lets see what the courts have to say. Why is it an issue for the courts?
|
|
#5
June 17th 05, 04:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I suppose this is your idea of a point-by-point rebuttal?!
You clearly don't know squat about the case, and what is going on in Groton. But you have your position. SOP.
|
|
#6
June 17th 05, 05:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Skylune" wrote in message lkaboutaviation.com... I suppose this is your idea of a point-by-point rebuttal?! I see you're unable to answer my questions. You clearly don't know squat about the case, and what is going on in Groton. Actually, I'm very familiar with it. You are not. But you have your position. I haven't stated a position.
|
|
#7
June 17th 05, 05:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
If you knew anything, you wouldn't ask the stupid question,
"Why is it an issue for the courts?" Just like the other know it alls that said in other posts that there aren't exclusion clauses in their life insurance policies for GA related deaths. WRONG.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stop the noise | airads | Owning | 112 | July 6th 04 06:42 PM |
| Stop the noise | airads | Aerobatics | 131 | July 2nd 04 01:28 PM |
| Stop the noise | airads | General Aviation | 88 | July 2nd 04 01:28 PM |
| Stop the noise | airads | Piloting | 169 | July 2nd 04 01:28 PM |
| Stop The Noise petitions FAA to increase N number size | Earl Grieda | Piloting | 19 | April 26th 04 04:46 AM |
Hybrid Mode
