![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jessica Taylor" wrote in message ... Answering the latter question alone, some TRSAless Class D radar facilities have the radar position(s) in the tower cab, which probably reduces the personnel required compared to a separate room or facility which might require separate supervisors, etc. Why would the physical location of the radar scope(s) affect the number of personnel required to staff them? For example at KRDG, the same controller may operate both local and approach (departure) during off-peak times. Not sure if radar control in the tower cab qualifies as a "TRACON" though or if there is another acronym for the setup. That setup is known as a TRACAB. I've never been in one, but I assume such facilities have only one radar position. But many TRACONs with multiple radar positions combine them at times to one radar position in the radar room or in the tower cab or even one controller working all TRACON and tower positions. It was stated here that a TRSA requires additional staff. I don't see why that would be, everything else being equal. RFD and RDG have about the same level of traffic, RFD has a TRSA but RDG does not. I see no reason why RDG would require greater staffing to work the same traffic. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
R in a Circle (Airport Surveillance Radar) on VFR charts | Jeff Saylor | Piloting | 66 | May 12th 04 04:05 PM |
UTICA TRSA shape | Jeff Saylor | Piloting | 4 | May 10th 04 05:54 AM |