|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
September 18th 03, 01:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 02:03:57 GMT, David Megginson
wrote: Personally, I'd be pretty nervous flying an ILS approach below non-precision minima if I didn't have some identifiable location that I could check my altimeter on the glidepath, but I don't know if there's any regulation requiring that either in Canada or the U.S. Then again, I don't claim to be speaking from extensive experience -- my rating is very new, and I've never done an approach with a ceiling below 400 ft. There's no regulation to that effect in the US. I don't know about Canada. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Which of these approaches is loggable? | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | August 16th 03 05:22 PM |
Hybrid Mode
