![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael" wrote: And even then, you have a choice of hunting in enroute mode, or annoying wing waggle in approach mode. If it does this, something's wrong. It's not a difficult control task. You should be able to pick a combination of approach/enroute mode and CDI scale that produces a smooth, on course track. Try approach mode with a 1-mile CDI. If that doesn't do it, I would suspect some binding in the aileron controls or a faulty roll servo. -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If it does this, something's wrong. It's not a difficult control task.
I don't doubt it - but every installation I've seen does it. I know full well it's not a difficult control task, but I also know it's not the same control task for all airplanes. The more roll stability the plane has, the easier the task. A friend of mine who flew 727's for a while says that the autopilots on those were the same way - they never used nav track enroute because twiddling the heading bug (or even the roll trim) worked better. Michael |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael" wrote: If it does this, something's wrong. It's not a difficult control task. I don't doubt it - but every installation I've seen does it. I know full well it's not a difficult control task, but I also know it's not the same control task for all airplanes. The more roll stability the plane has, the easier the task. Nevertheless, the S-Tec autopilot is not much different from an industrial PLC. Such devices --even cheap ones-- can handle all sorts of PV upsets with rapid overshoot damping. The S-Tec should do as well. Admittedly, my airplane is quite stable in roll, but really, so is a Mooney. And if things are a bit bumpy, the Mooney might even be better, due to higher wing loading. A friend of mine who flew 727's for a while says that the autopilots on those were the same way - they never used nav track enroute because twiddling the heading bug (or even the roll trim) worked better. Well, it depends on what one is tracking. Attempting to track a wavering CDI off a distant VOR will certainly produce oscillations. Tracking a CDI driven by a GPS is quite another matter. -- Dan C-172RG at BFM |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nevertheless, the S-Tec autopilot is not much different from an industrial PLC.
I suspect you're wrong there. I once interviewed an engineer who worked for that particular manufacturer for a possible position with our company. If he's representative of even the bottom quartile of their engineers, I would say there is a huge difference - the engineers who design industrial PLC's are dramatically more competent. My guess is that the S-TEC is to PLC's what the Concorde or Gill battery is to lawn tractor batteries - lower quality than even the cheapest commercial offering, at a price slightly higher than the most expensive commercial offering. Michael |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DGs and Autopilots | Andrew Gideon | Owning | 11 | April 14th 05 06:04 PM |
DGs and Autopilots | Andrew Gideon | Products | 11 | April 14th 05 06:04 PM |
ALTRAK pitch system flight report | optics student | Home Built | 2 | September 21st 03 11:49 PM |