![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Byron Covey" wrote:
You can't do a roll and retain 1 G positive throughout the roll. Actually, you can't do ANY maneuver and maintain exactly 1G. The G's you feel are the sum of the Earth's gravity and your acceleration. Since the Earth's gravity is always 1G, if your total G force is always 1G, then your acceleration must be zero, and you can not change your flight path. You can certainly maintain positive G's through maneuvers (even inverted), and you can certainly maintain something close to 1G though maneuvers, but you cannot maintain exactly 1G through the whole thing. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not quite true. Start a coordinated turn, decending at the same time
and you can keep the bathroom scale you're sitting on reading your weight. At 45 degrees of back I think you'll find the airplane has to be accelerating downward too, so the .707 horizontal G and the .707 vertical G combine to provide 1 G into the pilot's seat. At inverted, you'll have to pull back pretty hard on the yoke to provide a relative to the pilot upward acceleration of 64.4 f/sec*2 to keep pasted into the seat at 1 g. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tony" wrote in message
oups.com... Not quite true. Start a coordinated turn, decending at the same time and you can keep the bathroom scale you're sitting on reading your weight. Only if that descent involves a vertical acceleration. That is, it's not a constant rate descent. A constant rate descent would require 1G of *vertical* lift, which means greater than 1G of actual lift from the wing (where I blatantly misuse "1G" as a way of describing the amount of lift equal to the weight of the airplane ![]() 1.41G. Alternatively, maintaining 1G of lift would mean that the descent rate would be increasing throughout the turn. Depending on the bank angle, this could turn into a pretty dramatic descent rate in short order. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
Rolling a 172 - or not | Scott Lowrey | Piloting | 55 | November 16th 03 12:15 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | September 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | August 1st 03 07:27 AM |