![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jonathan Goodish" wrote in message ... In article , Larry Dighera wrote: The kid's alleged behavior (being under age and driving his mother's car presumably on a public street without possessing a driver's licence nor her permission, and flying an aircraft without benefit of license nor permission to use the aircraft) is irresponsible and illegal. An adult would have been prosecuted with those crimes (and may still be). In this country (US) the parents are responsible for the behavior of their minor (under 18 years of age) children, so they will at least bear the cost of damage their son caused to the aircraft, and could conceivably face negligence charges if the District Attorney feels the case warrants. All this is obvious. But quite often, not so simple. What if the offender has limited to no ability to pay? What if the driver who hits you on the freeway has no insurance? What if the guy who hits you has insurance, but you only get blue-book on a total loss for a car you just drove off the lot yesterday? Some parents just don't care, and as a result, their kids just don't care. In the end, the good guy often ends up out of luck in some fashion. JKG Jonathan, I agree 100% with what you say. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Larry Dighera wrote: The kid's alleged behavior (being under age and driving his mother's car presumably on a public street without possessing a driver's licence nor her permission, and flying an aircraft without benefit of license nor permission to use the aircraft) is irresponsible and illegal. An adult would have been prosecuted with those crimes (and may still be). ----------------------------------reply----------------------------------------------------- Hello All, The statutes in Alabama that are used to prosecute a juvenile in Alabama are different from the adult charges. If there is a charge, it will be "violation of Youthful Offender Statutes". In other words, the charge will have no name such as theft of property, etc.. The young man's criminal history, if convicted, will read "Youthful Offender". We are hosting a CAP SARX this weekend so I'm sure some of the folks from that part of the State will have the inside scoop. Stephen Pearce Foley, Alabama |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Piloting | 114 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Will US Sport Pilot be insurable? | Mark James Boyd | Soaring | 12 | November 29th 03 03:57 AM |
Small Sheriff's Departments Using Helicopters | Gig Giacona | Rotorcraft | 23 | September 7th 03 09:52 AM |