![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There seem to be few places in California where MOGAS is still legal.
Most of California requires additives to automotive gas that the FAA explicity prohibits under any STC. -Robert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mystery solved. Modesto gets its mogas (don't call it auto gas any more
says the distributor) from an outfit called Boyett Petroleum in Modesto. Anybody can get it from the refineries over in the Bay area or from Reno, no problem. It is just that it is illegal to use it in automobiles, but perfectly legal in off road vehicles. All California highway vehicles are restricted to a 5.5% gasahol mixture or diesel. Repeat, ANY DISTRIBUTOR can get pure mogas from the refinery in 8000 gallon lots if they want it in California. Now the problem seems to be convincing a few airports to go through the hassle to get it in small quantities so that it doesn't sit for six months and break down. Jim "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message ups.com... There seem to be few places in California where MOGAS is still legal. Most of California requires additives to automotive gas that the FAA explicity prohibits under any STC. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wonder if the small quantities will cause the price required to cover
the overhead of the tank, etc more than the price of the higher volume 100LL? When I had the Aeronca Chief (65hp cont) the engine ran MUCH better on MOGAS than 100LL. The automotive detergents helped keep the engine clean along with the hotter burning lower octane. -Robert |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert M. Gary wrote:
I wonder if the small quantities will cause the price required to cover the overhead of the tank, etc more than the price of the higher volume 100LL? When I had the Aeronca Chief (65hp cont) the engine ran MUCH better on MOGAS than 100LL. The automotive detergents helped keep the engine clean along with the hotter burning lower octane. What makes you think the lower octane burns hotter? How does the difference in octane additive make the fuel burn hotter? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 02:35:08 GMT, john smith wrote:
Robert M. Gary wrote: I wonder if the small quantities will cause the price required to cover the overhead of the tank, etc more than the price of the higher volume 100LL? When I had the Aeronca Chief (65hp cont) the engine ran MUCH better on MOGAS than 100LL. The automotive detergents helped keep the engine clean along with the hotter burning lower octane. What makes you think the lower octane burns hotter? How does the difference in octane additive make the fuel burn hotter? Some people insist low octane fuel burns FASTER, which might put more heat in the cyl - but I have seen info from fuel engineers thatndisputes this theory. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The Cubs at Hampton NH airfield were STC'ed for mogas when 80 octane became unavailable. The general feeling was that the engines had a tendency to stall in cold weather. (They certainly did have such a tendency, whatever the cause.) Furthermore, the instructors didn't like the smell of it (the instructor sits in the front seat of a Cub). Hampton still sells mogas (at one point it was cheaper on the field than at the gas stations all around) but the STCs have been removed and the Cubs run on 100LL. -- all the best, Dan Ford email (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com the blog: www.danford.net In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message news ![]() On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 02:35:08 GMT, john smith wrote: Some people insist low octane fuel burns FASTER, which might put more heat in the cyl - but I have seen info from fuel engineers thatndisputes this theory. I was always told the higher octane burns faster, and is consumed in a shorter duration, thus a lower temperature. Allen |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Allen wrote:
I was always told the higher octane burns faster, and is consumed in a shorter duration, thus a lower temperature. Other way 'round on the burn rate. From a motorcycle performance site - "The higher the octane, the slower the speed of the burn; the lower the octane the faster the burn. If the burn is too fast, uncontrolled combustion can occur. This most often is heard as “pinging” and is commonly referred to as detonation. This is because instead of burning through top dead center of the combustion stroke, the entire charge is ignited too early and explodes in the chamber and acts as a bomb. Conversely, if the speed of the burn is too slow, it continues after the useful work can be done in the motor and manifests itself as poor throttle response, reduced power output and increased emissions and fuel consumption. An engineering fact: THE MOST HORSEPOWER IS MADE AT THE THRESHOLD OF DETONATION. We have often gained horsepower on the dyno and felt improved starting and driveability going from Premium grade gas to Regular. This change was recently quantified in a customer’s Ducati M900 by reducing the cranking time to start-up from 15 to 3 revolutions, although part of the improvement is explained below." George Patterson Why do men's hearts beat faster, knees get weak, throats become dry, and they think irrationally when a woman wears leather clothing? Because she smells like a new truck. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
Thermal right, land left | John | Soaring | 195 | April 1st 04 11:43 PM |
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 4 | October 30th 03 03:09 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |