![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't pout, just be happy that they were concerned about your well-being.
If that's all there is to it, I am, indeed, happy that they are watching out for us! Quite frankly I'm surprised. Sorry to hear that you have had bad experiences with FF in your area...it is a valuable tool that should be used by everyone. We use flight following on most flights in our area. The only time it's ever a problem is around (the very busy airspace of) Chicago, where (ironically) we could most use FF. Usually Chicago won't accept a hand-off from adjacent controllers, and if we try to request FF they will reply "unable." Not that it really matters -- I have had airliners pop in front of me so close that I could read their logo, without Chicago ATC ever saying "boo" about it. Really, the only time we ever use FF around Chicago is on those rare occasions where they *will* accept a hand-off from an adjacent controller, as they did on this flight. Usually they just "cut us loose" as we approach Chicago and we just fly through the area (obviously outside the Class Bravo) using our "Mark One" eyeballs. Thanks for your response, Bob. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We use flight following on most flights in our area. The only time
it's ever a problem is around (the very busy airspace of) Chicago, where (ironically) we could most use FF. Usually Chicago won't accept a hand-off from adjacent controllers, and if we try to request FF they will reply "unable." Not that it really They can't drop you if you're IFR. :-) (hint hint) of course, there's no guarantee that you'll get a clearance either... -- Guy |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 20 Jun 2005 10:59:18 -0700, "Jay Honeck"
wrote: Don't pout, just be happy that they were concerned about your well-being. If that's all there is to it, I am, indeed, happy that they are watching out for us! Quite frankly I'm surprised. Did you keep the FF squawk code or go back to 1200? Usually Chicago won't accept a hand-off from adjacent controllers, Chicago center will accept handoffs, but Chicago approach probably will not. Having said that, even if Center cancels your FF because of no handoff, once you get near Approach's airspace, you can call Approach and they will almost always provide flight following through the area. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Did you keep the FF squawk code or go back to 1200?
Ah, good point. We kept squawking the code we were given till we landed. I wonder if we had switched to 1200, if Chicago would have seen that and figured out that we were landing (rather than crashing?) in Rantoul? Usually Chicago won't accept a hand-off from adjacent controllers, Chicago center will accept handoffs, but Chicago approach probably will not. Having said that, even if Center cancels your FF because of no handoff, once you get near Approach's airspace, you can call Approach and they will almost always provide flight following through the area. It seems like lately no one is accepting hand-offs from anyone along the Lake Michigan shoreline. We flew to Wisconsin yesterday, and Rockford wasn't able to hand us off to Milwaukee on the flight inbound. On the flight westbound, later in the day, Milwaukee handed us off to Rockford without difficulty, but they, in turn, cut us loose before we even hit the Mississipi, which was very unusual -- especially on a sleepy Sunday evening. (I swear, we were the only plane he was handling.) Usually RFD will seamlessly hand us off to Quad Cities approach. We called up QC once we hit the Big Muddy, and they were able to handle us without difficulty. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message oups.com... We use flight following on most flights in our area. The only time it's ever a problem is around (the very busy airspace of) Chicago, where (ironically) we could most use FF. Usually Chicago won't accept a hand-off from adjacent controllers, and if we try to request FF they will reply "unable." Not that it really matters -- I have had airliners pop in front of me so close that I could read their logo, without Chicago ATC ever saying "boo" about it. What Chicago are you talking about? Your initial message dealt with Chicago Center, now it sounds like you're talking about Chicago Approach. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RAF Blind/Beam Approach Training flights | Geoffrey Sinclair | Military Aviation | 3 | September 4th 09 06:31 PM |
Flight Simulator 2004 pro 4CDs, Eurowings 2004, Sea Plane Adventures, Concorde, HONG KONG 2004, World Airlines, other Addons, Sky Ranch, Jumbo 747, Greece 2000 [include El.Venizelos], Polynesia 2000, Real Airports, Private Wings, FLITESTAR V8.5 - JEP | vvcd | Piloting | 0 | September 22nd 04 07:13 PM |
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | April 1st 04 02:54 AM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |