A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

STEC-30



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 21st 05, 04:54 PM
Michael
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If it does this, something's wrong. It's not a difficult control task.

I don't doubt it - but every installation I've seen does it. I know
full well it's not a difficult control task, but I also know it's not
the same control task for all airplanes. The more roll stability the
plane has, the easier the task.

A friend of mine who flew 727's for a while says that the autopilots on
those were the same way - they never used nav track enroute because
twiddling the heading bug (or even the roll trim) worked better.

Michael

  #2  
Old June 21st 05, 10:41 PM
Dan Luke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Michael" wrote:
If it does this, something's wrong. It's not a difficult control task.


I don't doubt it - but every installation I've seen does it. I know
full well it's not a difficult control task, but I also know it's not
the same control task for all airplanes. The more roll stability the
plane has, the easier the task.


Nevertheless, the S-Tec autopilot is not much different from an industrial
PLC. Such devices --even cheap ones-- can handle all sorts of PV upsets with
rapid overshoot damping. The S-Tec should do as well.

Admittedly, my airplane is quite stable in roll, but really, so is a Mooney.
And if things are a bit bumpy, the Mooney might even be better, due to higher
wing loading.

A friend of mine who flew 727's for a while says that the autopilots on
those were the same way - they never used nav track enroute because
twiddling the heading bug (or even the roll trim) worked better.


Well, it depends on what one is tracking. Attempting to track a wavering CDI
off a distant VOR will certainly produce oscillations. Tracking a CDI driven
by a GPS is quite another matter.
--
Dan
C-172RG at BFM


  #3  
Old June 22nd 05, 12:47 AM
Michael
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Nevertheless, the S-Tec autopilot is not much different from an industrial PLC.

I suspect you're wrong there. I once interviewed an engineer who
worked for that particular manufacturer for a possible position with
our company. If he's representative of even the bottom quartile of
their engineers, I would say there is a huge difference - the engineers
who design industrial PLC's are dramatically more competent.

My guess is that the S-TEC is to PLC's what the Concorde or Gill
battery is to lawn tractor batteries - lower quality than even the
cheapest commercial offering, at a price slightly higher than the most
expensive commercial offering.

Michael

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DGs and Autopilots Andrew Gideon Owning 11 April 14th 05 06:04 PM
DGs and Autopilots Andrew Gideon Products 11 April 14th 05 06:04 PM
ALTRAK pitch system flight report optics student Home Built 2 September 21st 03 11:49 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.