![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stan Gosnell wrote:
(Everett M. Greene) wrote in : According to an article in the November 2004 edition of Scientific American, the GPS satellites' clocks have a 7 microsec per day effect due to relativistic motion and a 45 microsec per day effect due to the lower gravity in orbit. The two effects partially cancel, so the net adjustment is 38 microseconds. It is left as an exercise for the student to determine the effect of an uncompensated time value on position values. It's many miles. Nanosecond accuracy is required for the current ~10 meter accuracy. Linear extrapolation would lead to ~10 kilometers. Is it as great as that? The relativistic effects would be the same for all satellites, so, while a clock on Earth may disagree with a clock on the satellite, all satellites would disagree by the same amount. Therefore, while the uncompensated effect may well be several kilometres, wouldn't it always be the _same_ kilometres? -- Nick |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nick wrote in
: Is it as great as that? The relativistic effects would be the same for all satellites, so, while a clock on Earth may disagree with a clock on the satellite, all satellites would disagree by the same amount. Therefore, while the uncompensated effect may well be several kilometres, wouldn't it always be the _same_ kilometres? No. They originally tried it without any corrections, because many of the design engineers didn't think it would matter. Turned out it did matter. The theoretical error is large, although I can't remember the exact numbers. BTW, it was September 2004, not November. The GPS receiver doesn't really know the time, it just synchronizes with the time reported by the satellites. If it thinks the time is different than what it is, then it thinks it's in the wrong position, because it calculates position based on the difference in time it takes the signals to travel from different satellites. The SciAm article has a fuller explanation, and you can also find several explanations on the net. You can start at http://www.gpsinformation.net. -- Regards, Stan "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." B. Franklin |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|