A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

14 yr old pilot



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 22nd 05, 03:08 AM
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
...
"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...
But what evidence (if any) was there that the previous laws were less
effective than more severe ones? The mere fact that a legislature

decided
to
boost the penalties doesn't mean there was any good reason to think

that
the
previous statutes were less effective. The legislators could just have

been
pandering to ideologues whose policy preferences are not based on sound
evidence.

Since that was neither the issue, nor the question (you seem to have a
strong propensity to add conditions and qualifiers to your responses) ,

I
fell no obligation to respond.


Huh? You flatly asserted that "many states" a) found out that

distinguishing
joyriding from theft had had an "adverse effect", and b) then revised

their
laws accordingly.


Which is beyond the point that your extended three or four times so go play
with yourself.



  #2  
Old June 22nd 05, 11:41 AM
Gary Drescher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...

"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
...
Huh? You flatly asserted that "many states" a) found out that
distinguishing joyriding from theft had had an "adverse effect",
and b) then revised their laws accordingly.


Which is beyond the point that your extended three or four times
so go play with yourself.


How to sustain a belief in an untenable ideology: 1) Make up fake facts as
needed. 2) When your bluff is called, admit no error; resort to inchoate
insults instead.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep C J Campbell Instrument Flight Rules 117 July 22nd 04 05:40 PM
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep C J Campbell Piloting 114 July 22nd 04 05:40 PM
Will US Sport Pilot be insurable? Mark James Boyd Soaring 12 November 29th 03 03:57 AM
Small Sheriff's Departments Using Helicopters Gig Giacona Rotorcraft 23 September 7th 03 09:52 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.