Connecticut considers "booting" aircraft

Bob wrote:
"HE" is a "SHE". Gov Jody Rell.

The former "HE" is in federal prison.

She also said the now infamous Supreme Court decision allowing the
state to take private property and give it to another private
individual is "needed".

Lucky for us she's a republician. (that's a joke).

That's it from the highest taxed state in the Union where government
land grabs to the highest political donators are legal. What would our
founding fathers say? For shame.



That crap (abusing emminent domain to trranfer property from one
private owner to another) has been going on for many decades now.

I'm surprised it took this long for a case to get to the USSC, my
guess is that the lower courts have simply been refusing appeals.

--

FF

On 25 Jun 2005 09:28:01 -0700, wrote:



That crap (abusing emminent domain to trranfer property from one
private owner to another) has been going on for many decades now.

I'm surprised it took this long for a case to get to the USSC, my
guess is that the lower courts have simply been refusing appeals.

It seems to me that taking any ad valorem tax-exempt property would
qualify as being for the public good. Look out churches!

On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 19:42:18 GMT, Andy Asberry
wrote:

On 25 Jun 2005 09:28:01 -0700, wrote:



That crap (abusing emminent domain to trranfer property from one
private owner to another) has been going on for many decades now.

I'm surprised it took this long for a case to get to the USSC, my
guess is that the lower courts have simply been refusing appeals.

It seems to me that taking any ad valorem tax-exempt property would
qualify as being for the public good. Look out churches!

And airports around here are not tax exempt.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com

Roger wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 19:42:18 GMT, Andy Asberry
wrote:


On 25 Jun 2005 09:28:01 -0700, wrote:



That crap (abusing emminent domain to trranfer property from one
private owner to another) has been going on for many decades now.

I'm surprised it took this long for a case to get to the USSC, my
guess is that the lower courts have simply been refusing appeals.

It seems to me that taking any ad valorem tax-exempt property would
qualify as being for the public good. Look out churches!


And airports around here are not tax exempt.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com

How about booting those politicians -- right away.

On 25 Jun 2005 09:28:01 -0700, wrote:



Bob wrote:
"HE" is a "SHE". Gov Jody Rell.

The former "HE" is in federal prison.

She also said the now infamous Supreme Court decision allowing the
state to take private property and give it to another private
individual is "needed".

Lucky for us she's a republician. (that's a joke).

That's it from the highest taxed state in the Union where government
land grabs to the highest political donators are legal. What would our
founding fathers say? For shame.



That crap (abusing emminent domain to trranfer property from one
private owner to another) has been going on for many decades now.

I'm surprised it took this long for a case to get to the USSC, my
guess is that the lower courts have simply been refusing appeals.

Here in Michigan they are already introducing a bill to prevent
"eminent domain" from being used to transfer private property to
another private entitie.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com

Roger wrote:
On 25 Jun 2005 09:28:01 -0700, wrote:



Bob wrote:
"HE" is a "SHE". Gov Jody Rell.

The former "HE" is in federal prison.

She also said the now infamous Supreme Court decision allowing the
state to take private property and give it to another private
individual is "needed".

Lucky for us she's a republician. (that's a joke).

That's it from the highest taxed state in the Union where government
land grabs to the highest political donators are legal. What would our
founding fathers say? For shame.



That crap (abusing emminent domain to trranfer property from one
private owner to another) has been going on for many decades now.

I'm surprised it took this long for a case to get to the USSC, my
guess is that the lower courts have simply been refusing appeals.

Here in Michigan they are already introducing a bill to prevent
"eminent domain" from being used to transfer private property to
another private entitie.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com

Its a done deal in Alabama. It doesn't seem to be a Democrat of
Republican issue. Rather it seems to be rich elites who like the
SCOTUS decision. States that are ruled by them like it, more populist
states such as Alabama don't.