![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If the other traffic were IFR, then what is the purpose of ATC pointing out
that traffic? "Peter Duniho" wrote in : "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message 1... This means someone was flying VFR not too far from your position. For what it's worth, there was nothing in the original post that suggested that the traffic being reported was VFR versus IFR, and at 3000' IFR was a very real possibility. Even when separation services are being provided between two airplanes, ATC may report one as traffic to the other (and often does). Pete |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message
1... If the other traffic were IFR, then what is the purpose of ATC pointing out that traffic? Huh? The purpose is the same reason they would point out VFR traffic: so that you are aware of other traffic in your vicinity. Pete |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I thought the purpose was to maintain visual separation from the other
traffic. If both traffic are under IFR, then separation is automatically provided, so I still don't see what the purpose of pointing out the other traffic is. "Peter Duniho" wrote in : "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message 1... If the other traffic were IFR, then what is the purpose of ATC pointing out that traffic? Huh? The purpose is the same reason they would point out VFR traffic: so that you are aware of other traffic in your vicinity. Pete |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ATC doesn't know all the time if you're IMC or VMC. Even if the traffic
in your area is also IFR and therefore under their control they still may point it out to you so it doesn't come as a surprise when you get within visual distance of each other. I was flying IFR in the northeast a few years back at 5000' ATC called out "a string of sixes 4 miles 12 O'clock". As it turned out we were between layers of clouds between 4500 and 6000' or so. In a minute or so I saw 3 Dash-8's going the opposite direction a couple of thousand feet above me. There was no collision hazard of course but it was good that the controller told me because I might have been surprised to see them otherwise. Andrew Sarangan wrote: I thought the purpose was to maintain visual separation from the other traffic. If both traffic are under IFR, then separation is automatically provided, so I still don't see what the purpose of pointing out the other traffic is. "Peter Duniho" wrote in : "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message .61... If the other traffic were IFR, then what is the purpose of ATC pointing out that traffic? Huh? The purpose is the same reason they would point out VFR traffic: so that you are aware of other traffic in your vicinity. Pete |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ATC called out "a string of sixes 4 miles 12 O'clock"
What is a "six"? Jose r.a.student stripped - I don't follow it. -- You may not get what you pay for, but you sure as hell pay for what you get. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why would you be surprised to see airplanes flying a couple of thousand
ft above you? I never had a controller point out a traffic 2000' above except in unusual circumstances - ie heavy C130 crossing above my flight path etc.. Robert Chambers wrote in : ATC doesn't know all the time if you're IMC or VMC. Even if the traffic in your area is also IFR and therefore under their control they still may point it out to you so it doesn't come as a surprise when you get within visual distance of each other. I was flying IFR in the northeast a few years back at 5000' ATC called out "a string of sixes 4 miles 12 O'clock". As it turned out we were between layers of clouds between 4500 and 6000' or so. In a minute or so I saw 3 Dash-8's going the opposite direction a couple of thousand feet above me. There was no collision hazard of course but it was good that the controller told me because I might have been surprised to see them otherwise. Andrew Sarangan wrote: I thought the purpose was to maintain visual separation from the other traffic. If both traffic are under IFR, then separation is automatically provided, so I still don't see what the purpose of pointing out the other traffic is. "Peter Duniho" wrote in : "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message 1.61... If the other traffic were IFR, then what is the purpose of ATC pointing out that traffic? Huh? The purpose is the same reason they would point out VFR traffic: so that you are aware of other traffic in your vicinity. Pete |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Sarangan wrote:
If the other traffic were IFR, then what is the purpose of ATC pointing out that traffic? If you report the traffic in sight ATC can tell you to maintain visual separation, thus relieving him or her of separation duties and allowing less separation distance. Otherwise, it's also an enhancement to safety if you and ATC are both assuring separation. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
how much money have you lost on the lottery? NOW GET THAT MONEY BACK! | shane | Home Built | 0 | February 5th 05 07:54 AM |
BD5B | Big John | Home Built | 36 | November 19th 03 12:07 AM |
The Little Wheel in Back | Veeduber | Home Built | 6 | September 8th 03 10:29 AM |
Localizer Back Course vs. ILS | ilsub | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 25th 03 04:04 PM |
they took me back in time and the nsa or japan wired my head and now they know the idea came from me so if your back in time and wounder what happen they change tim liverance history for good. I work at rts wright industries and it a time travel trap | tim liverance | Military Aviation | 0 | August 18th 03 12:18 AM |